Why does parris plead for the lives of john proctor aud rebecca nurse on the morning of their scheduled execution?

1 answer:

5 0

Abigail has "flown the overthrow", as it were. This uncovered her as lier and dishonors Paris. Thus, there is little regret in Paris' pleadings for a stay in the executions. Parris is likewise frightened on the grounds that hee found a blade in his front entryway, and is worried about the possibility that that if respectable nationals like John Proctor and Rebecca Nurse are hanged, the town will revolt. Paris even begins to lard like a child, not in view of all the affliction he has caused, but since Abigail stole his cash before she cleared out.

You might be interested in

What did the government have to do with ww1 and with ww2?

alexgriva [62]

In both wars, the governments of the world had to try to fix the what had been destroyed.

America, on the other hand, had little to no damage in ww1 but had plenty in ww2. They spent most of the time after ww1 partying and making the stock market crash. While after ww2, they tried to get communism out of the new countries.

6 0

3 years ago

Why was the Black Panther Party considered a threat

Mashutka [201]

Answer:

Black Panther Greatest Threat to U.S. Security. WASHINGTON (UPI) - The, Black Panther party represents! the greatest threat among the! black extremist groups

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago

Which of these is NOT a monetary policy tool?

Jobisdone [24]

Answer:

Balance accounts .

Explanation:

The policy of balancing public accounts is not part of the group of monetary policy measures, but rather of the group of fiscal policies. That is, the balancing of accounts implies that expenditures are limited in certain areas of the government, with the objective of reducing the fiscal deficit and thus promoting economic collection by the government in order to guarantee the stability of the public accounts.

5 0

2 years ago

The development of what written language marked the beginning of writing

GREYUIT [131]

The first written language is cuneiform. Cuneiform marked the beginning of writing

6 0

2 years ago

Compare the federal government's role in the fight against communism with its role in the fight against racial discrimination. H

DedPeter [7]

The correct answer to this open question is the following.

If we make a comparison between the federal government's role in the fight against communism with its role in the fight against racial discrimination, we find considerable differences.

During the Red Scare of the 1920s, the federal government of the United States was very concerned about the presence of anarchists and communists in the United States territory. That is why US President Woodrow Wilson ordered the Department of Justice to initiate the Palmer Raids to arrest communists and anarchists.

During the Second Red Scare in the times of Wisconsin Republican Senator Joseph McCartney, he accused the presence of communists in the interior of the US federal government and the military. The problem was that he accused but never presented valid evidence.

One way or the other the federal government was worried, concerned, and act in many different ways.

Regarding the fight against racial discrimination, the federal government has acted very differently. It seems that the government is not as interested as in the above-mentioned cases. It seems that it has not the same political interest as in the case of anarchism or communism. Truly, racism is not the first thing on the political agenda of the US.

How involved were citizens in these fights?

Citizens basically reacted with fear during the Red Sacre times. The government and mass media told them to be fearful of communist, and they were afraid. And they started to accuse people with no evidence at all.

Regarding the fight against racism, here it seems that some US citizens are more concerned about this issue and have actively participated in public demonstrations.

4 0

2 years ago