Answer:
im sorry i be live its B this mit be rong
Explanation:
Thanks to decisions by the Supreme Court, home ownership in the United States is more inclusive of other races apart from White Americans.
Both before and after the Fair Housing Act formally made it illegal to discriminate based on a person's race and gender, the Supreme Court made some decisions that tried to make home ownership more inclusive such as:
- Shelley v. Kraemer - here the Supreme Court ruled that it was not possible to enforce covenants in the deeds to property that were restrictive based on race.
- Jones v. Mayer Co. - the Supreme Court ruled that any form of racial discrimination in home ownership was illegal
These are just two cases where the Supreme Court's decision affected homeownership but there are more.
We can conclude however, that based on the Supreme Court's decisions, homeownership is more inclusive of other races.
<em>Find out more at brainly.com/question/2630375.</em>
It's important to note that most colonists, including the Puritans, didn't treat Native Americans with respect. They would enslave them, try to convert them to Christianity, and force them off the lands they had held for centuries (without any payment, even!). William Penn was different. He did NOT enslave them (B is incorrect), nor did he ignore them (C is incorrect). Instead, he tried to make peace with them. He treated them with respect, by letting them keep their traditions separate from the colonists (A is incorrect) and, when he needed land, paid a fair price for it. D is correct!
Answer: D
B it was forces resserrlemat of cherokees to land west of the mississippi
Answer:
a) Encouraging citizens to file lawsuits against other parties
Explanation:
Encouraging citizens to file lawsuits against other parties is not one of the primary ways political parties shape public policy. Therefore, the option (a) is the correct answer.