The statement III Aggregate plans often perform planning for fictitious/abstract products.
Combination-making plans refer back to the method of developing, retaining, and reading the approximate scope of the operations of a commercial enterprise corporation. It commonly includes targeted profits forecasts, stock stages, and manufacturing levels.
Aggregate planning is typically finished 365 days into the destiny. a few examples of combination making plans are hiring short people, shedding employees for a selected period, or bypassing education. This works as a powerful benchmark for diploma beneficial resource utilization and implementation.
The time period mixture means that the making of plans is completed for a single traditional measure of output or, on the maximum, a few aggregated product lessons. The purpose of aggregate planning is to set traditional output ranges within the near medium destiny in the face of fluctuating or unsure needs.
Learn more about the aggregate plan here brainly.com/question/18803972
#SPJ4
Answer:
Given that Honduras is a small economy in Central America, and it keeps a fixed exchange rate with the US, and capital is perfectly mobile, but interest rates are three percent in the US and six percent in Honduras, the explanation of the difference in these interest rates are as follows:
Honduras has a higher interest rate, meaning that its sovereign bonds pay higher values than the American ones, as well as its banks also pay higher interests on their investments compared to American banks.
This is so for a double reason: on the one hand, because the Honduran economy is less reliable than the American economy, which is larger and therefore more solvent and capable of overcoming eventual crises, with which the risk of default is less.
On the other hand, the Honduran economy is more dependent on foreign investment, so it must offer higher interest rates to attract such investments.
Question Completion:
Matrix payoff:
Sharon
Left Right
Paolo Left 8, 3 4, 4
Right 5, 3 5, 4
Answer:
The only dominant strategy in this game is for ___Paolo______ to choose ____Right______.
The outcome reflecting the unique Nash equilibrium in this game is as follows: Paolo chooses ____Right______ and Sharon chooses __ Right_____.
Explanation:
a) Paolo's dominant strategy is the strategy that always provides the greater utility to Paolo, no matter what Sharon's strategy is. In this case, the dominant strategy for Paolo is to choose RIGHT always.
b) The Nash Equilibrium concept determines the optimal solution in a non-cooperative game in which each player (e.g. Paolo and Sharon) lacks any incentive to change their initial strategies. This implies that each player can achieve their desired outcomes by not deviating from their initial strategies since each player's strategy is optimal when considering the decisions of the other player.
No, its okay not to use all that extra stuff, so F
Answer:
THERE ARE SCARCITY EVEN IN AN AFFLUENT COUNTRY LIKE THE UNITED STATES BECAUSE WANTS ARE LIMITED BUT NEEDS ARE UNLIMITED. SOME PEOPLE ARE POOR WHILE OTHERS ARE WEALTHY
