Compatibility mode is so older or different versions of word all look the same regardless of its current version. So a lot of features you see in compatibility mode will be unavailable unless you upgrade. If you upgrade though be sure to uninstall the older version first. I hope this helped!!! Good Luck! :)
In python:
i = 1
lst1 = ([])
lst2 = ([])
while i <= 5:
person1 = int(input("Enter the salary individual 1 got in year {}".format(i)))
person2 = int(input("Enter the salary individual 1 got in year {}".format(i)))
lst1.append(person1)
lst2.append(person2)
i += 1
if sum(lst1) > sum(lst2):
print("Individual 1 has the highest salary")
else:
print("Individual 2 has the highest salary")
This works correctly if the two individuals do not end up with the same salary overall.
The answer is Smart technology :)
Solution:
The process of transaction can guarantee the reliability of business applications. Locking resources is widely used in distributed transaction management (e.g; two phase commit, 2PC) to keep the system consistent. The locking mechanism, however, potentially results in various deadlocks. In service oriented architecture, the deadlock problem becomes even worse because multiple transactions try to lock shared resources in the unexpectable way due to the more randomicity of transaction requests, which has not been solved by existing research results. In this paper, we investigate how to prevent local deadlocks, caused by the resource competition among multiple sub-transactions of a gl obal transaction, and global deadlocks from the competition among different global transactions. We propose a replication based approach to avoid the local deadlocks, and a timestamp based approach to significantly mitigate the global deadlocks. A general algorithm is designed for both local and global deadlock prevention. The experimental results demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of our deadlock prevention approach. Further, it is also proved that our approach provides higher system performance than traditional resource allocation schemes.
This is the required answer.
Answer:
No, it can't be verified with a pseudocode.
Explanation:
We can not verify this with a pseudocode because the largest integer that we can store in 32-bit integer goes by the formula 2^32 - 1 = 4, 294, 967,295 and this means that it has 32 ones. Or it may be 2^31 - 1 = 2, 147, 483,647 which is a two complement signed integer.
Despite the fact that it can not be verified by using pseudocode, we can do the Verification by writting programs Through some programming language or in plain English code.
In a 32-bit CPU, the largest integer that we can store is 2147483647 because we can store integer as 2^31 and - (2^31 + 1).
