Her style was characterized by usage of hyphens and weird sentencing so here is my attempt.
Explanation:
Once or twice it happened --
but all the while - i left the blame
to let the blame scorch the sky
and never, ever ----- reach
reach for me, because ---- no one could.
Attempting futility --- again
I rise, I fall, yes-- indeed again
Reach for me, because it seems
It's not possible
To reach, no one could.
<u>This poem attempts at her disjointed punctuation along with the free verse stanzas with augmented flows that seem to be found often in her poetry</u>. Hope this helps.
The answer would A.as information gathered from a primary source
For many months, the gigantic struggle then imminent had been painfully discernible to far-seeing men.
Which of these statements is true based on the information provided?
the war could not have been predicted.
the coming war was obvious to some people.
the struggle went on for many months.
watching the conflict was quite painful.
Answer:
From information provided, <u> the coming war was obvious to some people. </u>
Explanation:
Based on the sentence from the text, it is quite clear that the coming war was obvious to some people because according to the text, "the gigantic struggle then imminent had been painfully discernible to far-seeing men." which suggests that from the ongoing struggle, it was imminent that it would escalate to a war to "far-seeing men"
Answer:
action
Explanation:
If the subject is performing the action, then the sentence is in active voice. If the subject is simply receiving the action, then the sentence is in passive voice. Once you have identified which voice a sentence is in, you can follow several steps to revise it into the other voice.