The first appearance that an accused makes in court is called an arraignment.
The correct answer is B. Monetary gift
Explanation:
Monetary gift is a type of donation that involves transferring or giving money to an individual, a group of people, or an organization. This often means they can decide how to spend the money. Also, this differs from other types of donations such as donations of goods because this involves donating specific things such as food, clothes, or furniture; or from the donation of work/services because in this you give your time, skills, and effort.
A monetary gift is the type of donation the Social Concerns Committee made to the women's shelter because the committee gave this organization a check, which is equivalent to money. Also, to get the money they requested people to donate goods they later sold but in the end what the women's shelter receive was money.
A is the answer to this question.
Answer: C In a 100-meter race, two of Amy's co-participants won Silver and Bronze and she performed exceedingly well; it follows that Amy won Gold.
Explanation:
There is a flaw in the evidence presented by the lawyer, several flaws actually:
- The client could have been the culprit and left the main door and garage open as an alibi.
- There is no mention of there being an altercation with a thief that cost the wife her life.
- There is no mention of things being stolen to prove that it was a thief.
The attorney used one logic and deduced a flawed conclusion from it so the option that is similar has to do the same as the above.
Option A is not applicable here as blame was taken by the perpetrator.
Option B is not flawed as one would be expected to be late in such circumstances.
Option C has a flaw because performing exceedingly well is relative. Amy could simply be performing exceedingly well in relation to past races. Amy's co-participants could have performed even better which is why they won medals and while Amy performed exceedingly well by her standards, it was not enough to win a medal.
Option D has no flaw. It is a logical deduction and argument just like option E.
Answer: Party loyalists are likely to vote for all of their party's candidates in any election.