For the answer to the question on how did the invention of the printing press encourage secularism? The answer to this question is for the people could more easily share ideas that challenged church teachings.<span>
</span><span>I hope my answer helped you. Have a nice day!</span>
Answer:
The golden age of China and the Islamic Arab Empire were alike in such that both empires were able to spread religion on the trade routes, and both empires prospered because of trade; however, Islam had much more of an impact on government than Buddhism in the golden age China did.
Hope this helps, have a nice day/night! :D
Answer:
in my opinion I will say it's C
The new industrialization made many strains on the perfect of popular government in light of the fact that many individuals lost their human rights. Individuals were chipping away at low wages and were played off each other to simply wind up noticeably heartless workers in assembly lines. Equality was lost between the rich and poor. The rich settled on every one of the choices which deciphered many existences of the laborers which were generally in negative ways. The fairness of ladies to men was all the while battling; ladies were being paid lower compensation and worked similarly as hard. Youngsters were given something to do, which insulted the communist changes. The development of the immense enterprises and extraordinary fortunes were extraordinarily fruitful with industrializing another America however made a danger to its own particular subjects. Numerous families lived in dread of getting to be plainly jobless. Laborers had no security and the legislature wasn't sufficiently speedy to authorize manages and to direct them towards specialists in production lines. The rule that America embraced were barbarous, yet at any rate there were numerous union work gatherings, despite the fact that they were shot down ordinarily, regardless we remember them today.
It doesn't have a definition it's a phrase president Thomas Jefferson used in his first inaugural address in 1801 calling for a cautious, isolationist foreign policy
