The reform movement Susan B. Anthony promoted when she gave this speech is "expanding the right to vote to all female American citizens."
This is because during the time Susan B. Anthony made this statement or speech; the Constitutional amendment only allows male citizens to vote while restricting female citizens.
However, Susan B. Anthony, who was famous for being a social reformer and women's rights activist, especially on voting rights of women, was in this speech saying that the natural rights are not limited to men alone but extend to everybody, including women.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer to the question is option C. "expanding the right to vote to all female American citizens."
Learn more here: brainly.com/question/14130938
To encourage an ethnically diverse population, Germany wanted control on who should be who.
Because the people and the states kept any powers not given to the federal government. Anti-Federalists held that a bill of rights was necessary to safeguard individual liberty.
I don't really understand the difference between these two, politically, culturally, and economically. All I know between the two is that the Roman Republic are for the citizens of Rome. However, the Roman Empire is ruled by a Emperors. Now, the connotations of emperors are considered bad I think. But isn't Marcus Aurelius and Augustus very good leaders. Does anyone have some insight on how Roman R and Roman E differ from each other.
Because of better discipline and drilling of rank and files