1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Nitella [24]
3 years ago
5

This is the name given to the written decision of a case authored by justices of the supreme court that did not agree with the f

inal decision.
Law
2 answers:
erma4kov [3.2K]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: The correct answer is DISSENTING OPINION.

Explanation: DISSENTING OPINION refers to an opinion in a legal case expressing disagreement with the majority opinion.

Dissenting Opinion (or dissent) is written by a judge or judges when a majority opinion has been reached but there is disagreement with the final decision.

Troyanec [42]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: Dissenting Opinion

Explanation:

Any Judge’s written explanation of a decision is called an opinion. Multiple opinions can be written for an appeal. The opinion which is in majority among all the judges of Supreme Court is called majority opinion and if an opinion disagrees with majority on the basis of principles and logic it is called dissenting opinion.

I hope your answer is clear. Let me know if you’re looking for something else.

You might be interested in
this website has been robbing credits from me and it will go for all of u next if we don,t do something about so i say do not us
astraxan [27]
What is the website? Website.it?
5 0
3 years ago
How might the case of Gideon v. Wainwright affect the work of a prosecutor?
zhannawk [14.2K]

Answer:

b. Prosecutors need to watch the details guaranteed by the Sixth Amendment, such as ensuring a speedy trial, impartial jury, informed of accusation, etc.

6 0
3 years ago
Amanda and Kelly used to be friends after an argument with Amanda Kelly tell everyone at the galley middle school to me at the n
3241004551 [841]

Answer:

Is this like a legit question

6 0
3 years ago
Could Miranda be tried again for the same crime? <br><br> I need a good skid answer plz
allochka39001 [22]
ANSWER:

Yes, Miranda could be tried twice again for the same crime.

EXPLANATION:

After the Supreme Court ruling, Miranda retracted his confession, was tried again by the state of Arizona, found guilty and sent to prison. His retrial, based on a prisoner's successful appeal, did not constitute “double jeopardy” according to the court.

goodluck, support me by marking as brainliest!! :)
5 0
3 years ago
List two core Republican beliefs
Musya8 [376]

Answer:

Structure and consistency

7 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • When is a lie a lie?
    5·2 answers
  • 1.) Should officers with body-worn cameras be required to announce they are wearing the devices?
    11·1 answer
  • ¿Cómo puedo relacionar la película de los juicios de Nuremberg, con mi carrera de abogado?
    5·1 answer
  • Compare valid, void, voidable, and unenforceable contracts. Give a brief definition of each
    13·1 answer
  • Which law is unjust in South African law?and how can you change it<br>​
    6·1 answer
  • Ipahayag Ang pag sang ayon o pag salungat sa pagpapatupad ng anti terrorism law​
    7·1 answer
  • What is a prosecutor attorney?
    9·1 answer
  • Which headline best reflects the Miranda v. Arizona decision?
    12·1 answer
  • Who in the<br> Semester Knowdown im in Professor Tiger 1
    5·1 answer
  • Which criminal justice perspective emphasizes the efficient
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!