Answer: first continuous, then partial
Explanation: Continous reinforcement refers to a reinforcement schedule whereby every correct response performed is praised or reinforced, here, every time John's pet correctly performs that trick, the active or response of the pet is rewarded, thus will help carry out the correct response due to the reinforcement it receives. However, after sometime the reinforcement should be partial such that the action isn't reinforced every time the trick is performed. This according to the partial reinforcement extinction effect is more erobust than continuous reimbursement.
Answer:
The Court ruled in Schenck v. United States (1919) that speech creating a “clear and present danger” is not protected under the First Amendment. This decision shows how the Supreme Court's interpretation of the First Amendment sometimes sacrifices individual freedoms in order to preserve social order. In Schenck v.
Explanation:
Answer:
Married people who have children.
Explanation:
The category of the U.S. population in which women do most of the housework is married people who have children. This has been true for thousands of years because women are the caretakers and men mostly go to work. This should stop because women are equal to men and they should both be able to have a job.
The words all are what Christ wants and tolerance you tolerate ppl put up with them
