The Bambuti most likely have a culture that is passed down from generation to generation.
Explanation:
- Bambuti history is poorly known for its isolation.
- Even mentioned by Homer in the Iliad, in the 8th century BC and they are known by the ancient Egyptians.
- Europe's conquest of Africa will also begin the destruction of the rainforest in which their small communities live. They are hunters and gatherers.
- They differ from all other neighboring nations in their language. The life span is quite short, and rarely when they are over 50 years old.
- The forest is a major source of food for the Pygmy community.
Learn more on African cultures on
brainly.com/question/7066822
brainly.com/question/5617792
brainly.com/question/2848798
brainly.com/question/2848798
#lernwithBrainly
Answer:
Traders moved their goods across the Sahara in large groups called caravans. Camels were the main mode of transportation and were used to carry goods and people. Sometimes slaves carried goods as well. Large caravans were important because they offered protection from bandits.
Explanation: HOPE THIS HELPS<3
Answer:
I hope it helps u.
Explanation:
Arms races have generated a great deal of interest for a variety of reasons. They are widely believed to have significant consequences for states' security, but agreement stops there. In the debate over their consequences, one side holds that arms races increase the probability of war by undermining military stability and straining political relations. The opposing view holds that engaging in an arms race is often a state's best option for avoiding war when faced with an aggressive adversary. Debate over the causes of arms races is just as divided. One school believes that arms races are primarily rational responses to external threats and opportunities, whereas arms race skeptics believe that arms buildups are usually the product of a mixture of internal, domestic interests, including those of the scientists involved in research and development (R&D), the major producers of weapons systems, and the military services that will operate them. The policy implications of these contending views are equally contradictory; critics see arms control as a way to reduce the probability of war and rein in domestic interests that are distorting the state's security policy, and proponents argue that military competition is most likely to protect the state's international interests and preserve peace.
Arms buildups and arms races also play a prominent role in international relations (IR) theory. Building up arms is one of a state's three basic options for acquiring the military capabilities it requires to achieve its international goals; the other two are gaining allies and cooperating with its adversary to reduce threats. In broad terms, choosing between more competitive and more cooperative combinations of these options is among the most basic decisions a state must make, and it is often the most important.
Mark me as brainlist answer,
Have a nice day,
Thank you ☺
Answer:
they have an incentive for producers to produce more
Explanation:
