Answer:
2 the principle of causation.
(the post-Cartesian attempt to see everything as governed by simple laws of cause and effect)
1 the operation or relation of a cause and its effect.
(cause and effect play an important part in the universe)
A credible narrator or reliable narrator will tell the story from the point of view of the truth, it does not matter if she or he has any attachment to what is going on in the story, readers can trust their words and understand the circumstances the way they the story unfolds. On the other hand, the unreliable narrator will tell their story from their point of view, they will embelish their deeds, hide or down play their problems, therefore the reader will always have the impression that the unreliable narrator is conducing the reader to trust them.
The crediable narrator will bring the facts to the reader and put the reader in the story, the reader can have the feeling of engagement on the narration. On the other hand, the unreliable narrator brings the uncertainty feeling tothe reader and the reader can dot the i's as they please because they know they cannot fully trust the narrator.
Answer:
A. He is tired of the sea
Explanation:
The correct answer is B. Why don't we start with the symbolism of the door?
Explanation:
An outline is a plan or summary that contains the main or ideas to be developed during a speech or texts and that helps the author to cover all the ideas in an organized way. This means outlines mainly organize the content that should be included in some text, speech or discussion. In the case of outlining a discussion plan, it means to organized in a plan the contents that will be discussed and the order of them which allows the discussion to flow and cover all the important points. Considering this, the sentence that illustrates the technique of outlining a discussion plan is "Why don't we start with the symbolism of the door?" because this sentence shows Jeniffer has a plan to follow during the discussion and to cover all the important content, which is what the technique of outlining a discussion is about.
I would help with question considering that my class got done reading this book last year for a project, but there is not a question here to answer.
