1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
marissa [1.9K]
3 years ago
8

why did some of the founders of the American republic consider the lack of a national executive and judiciary under the Articles

of Confederation as one of the documents great strenghts
History
1 answer:
Sedbober [7]3 years ago
5 0
The reason why some of the founders of the American republic considered the lack of a national executive and judiciary under the Articles of Confederation as one <span>of the documents great strenghts is because the favored a weak central government and "strong" individual states--since they were afraid that a strong central government would become tyrannical. </span>
You might be interested in
Why did the south suffer food shortages during the Civil War
ipn [44]
Because the South lacked sufficient money from taxes and bonds and was forced to print paper money to pay its bills and they have very few backs and reserves
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How was rome able to construct a drinking fountain system
kakasveta [241]

The Romans were able to make fountains jet water into the air, by using the pressure of water flowing from a distant and higher source of water to create hydraulic head, or force.

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Koi hai kya<br><br><br>✌✌✌✌✌✌✌<br><br><br>XD..........​
Monica [59]

Answer:

noi koi noi hai-,-

kya aapke nakam meh ioden hai?-,-xD

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
How did the constitution of 1974 differ from the previous on
padilas [110]
In Yugoslavia? It added elaborate language protecting the self-managment system form state interference and expanding representation of republics and provinces in all electoral and policy forums
4 0
3 years ago
what is the difference between a kid being emancipated and a slave being emancipated?? how does it differ from the times of slav
damaskus [11]

The difference is quite simple, a child under the care of his parents is not a slave, or at least he is not supposed to be. A slave is a human being forced into involuntary and total servitude for the entirety of his life. A child is only under the authority of his parents until he turns 18. As of 18 years of age he/she is considered an adult and can do as he/she pleases with his own life. It needs to be remarked that authority is not the same as forced involuntary servitude (though some kids might be inclined to use such term when asked to collaborate with reasonable house chores but that is just plain hyperbolic immaturity). The emancipation of an actual slave by a slave owner is seldom voluntary and most times it is forced (it took a Civil War to settle the question). The emancipation of a kid takes place for very different reasons:

- The parents are found to neglect the well-being of the child (exploitation, sexual abuse, violent physical or psychological abuse, etc). The child is then emancipated, that is to say removed from his parent’s care and either becomes a ward of the State or the adopted son or daughter of another family).

- The child has left school at age 16 and starts working and earning his/her own salary and achieves financial independence from his /her parents. He/she marries or enters the army.

It is evident that the only similarity between the emancipation of a child and the emancipation of a slave is the use of the same word that has the same etymological source but very different meanings.

Between the times of actual slavery and now. Things have changed quite a bit. There was no legal framework for the emancipation of children, let alone laws preventing their neglect by parents. Emancipation of slaves occurred a long time before the emancipation of children was established in the 20th century. It did take place de facto before that but there was no legal framework.

5 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • John Locke believed that natural rights should be given only to the majority. should be limited for all people.
    7·2 answers
  • What influence did Abolitionists have on antislavery attitudes in the North?
    10·1 answer
  • In 1836, Texans declared independence from Mexico and created the _____.
    13·1 answer
  • What was the US trying to do in Europe and Japan?
    8·1 answer
  • What important precedents were established for the Federeal government?
    14·1 answer
  • How mighta historian assist a country's leaders who is engaged in war ?
    13·1 answer
  • Amendments that lowered the voting age to eighteen and gave women the right to vote were
    12·1 answer
  • Why do you think Roosevelt immediately established the New Deal?
    8·1 answer
  • What would have happened if the<br> earliest explorers to reach North America had<br> not stayed?
    9·1 answer
  • Look at the locations of four modern cites on lndain subcontinent what do these have in commmon
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!