The case <em>Miranda v. Arizona (1966)</em> was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court in which the court established that prosecutors cannot use a person's statements made in response to interrogation in police custody as evidence at their trial, unless the person was informed of what is known as "Miranda warning," but voluntarily waived these rights.
A "Miranda warning" is an explanation given to people arrested that informs them of the right to consult with an attorney before and during questioning. It also informs them of the right against self-incrimination before police questioning. The court's ruling protect those accused of a crime because it prevents them from incriminating themselves. It also reminds them of the importance of an attorney for achieving a successful trial.
Answer: Francisco Sagasti
Explanation:
Answer:
There were four main factors that Japan had in its favour that made modernization of the country faster. Japan's island geography, a centralised government, investment in education and a sense of nationalism were all factors that allowed Japan to modernize in under half a century
Explanation:
<span>According to Hughes, for many whites who went to Harlem, the blacks and their culture were viewed as something to be admired and respected. </span>
Answer: The charter contained contradictions, Religious liberty was guaranteed, except for Roman Catholicism and Judaism, A group of Jews landed in Georgia without explicit permission in 1733 but were allowed to remain, and The charter created a corporate body called a Trust and provided for an unspecified number of Trustees who would govern the colony from England.
