The correct answer would be 81
Answer:
b. Roma and Taylor
Explanation:
In this case each attorney is liable for his negligence, so Taylor will be liable for not appearing in court .
Roma is his supervisor, and he will also be liable because he is responsible for Taylor's performance.
The other attorneys in the firm will not be liable, because there is personal liability. When they are not directly involved in negligence, they will not be liable to Umberto.
Place your car in "park."
Defend you against approaching traffic.
When a vehicle collision occurs, it might be stressful, but it's crucial to keep in mind that your safety is always the top priority. Immediately upon being involved in a collision, keep in mind the following advice:
Verify your own health and the health of any passengers.
If you require medical asisstance or can't move your car, call "911" and follow the operator's instructions.
You should relocate to a safe area (such as the closest shoulder, the median, or the rightmost lane of the road) before exiting your car to examine the situation if it is still operational and neither you nor any of your passengers have been hurt.
to know more about property damage
brainly.com/question/4539405
#SPJ4
Answer: It might harm the reputation of Trend Flash Ltd. or distinguishing factor is impaired by using similar trademark by Sleek Feet LLC
Explanation:
According to the question, Sleek Feet LLC is using similar or alike trademark for their product(shoes) as well-established corporation ,Trend Flash already uses in registered form.
Having similar trademark can confuse consumers as they might not able to identify the difference between the trademark. It can end up purchasing wrong brand shoes rather what they actually intend to
This can tamper the reputation of Trend Flash Ltd. as they have well recognized trademark and difference in quality of shoes be a major factor in it.
Answer:
Positive Statements: 1st & 2nd ; Normative Statements: 3rd & 4th
Explanation:
Positive Economics is <u>objective</u> & <u>facts</u> based <u>actual</u> economic issue description , explaining verifiable phenomenas (causal relationships).
Normative Economics is <u>subjective</u> & opinion based conclusive <u>solutions</u> to economic issues, including '<u>ought to be</u>' unverifiable suggestions.
1. Lung cancer kills millions of people each year: reflects actual objective verifiable fact about an economic (health) issue.
2. Too many people smoke: denotes another actual objective variable fact connected to (potential cause of) the above economic (health) issue.
So , these two are Positive Statements.
3. If the government were to increase taxes on cigarettes, fewer people would smoke : Is subjective opinion based probable solution to the above economic (health) issue.
4. The government should increase taxes on cigarettes : Is an 'ought to' suggestion for an economic participant (govt) to solve the above economic (health) issue.
So , these two are Normative Statements