Answer:
Explanation:
Before preparing the retained earning statement, first we have to compute the closing balance of retained earning which is shown below:
The ending balance of retained earning = Beginning balance of retained earnings + net income - dividend paid
= $7,900 + $13,500 - $7,000
= $14,400
The statement of retained earnings is presented in the spreadsheet. Kindly find the attachment below:
Answer: The options are given below:
A. $18.00
B. $1,036.80
C. $2.00
D. $7.20
E. $64.00
The correct option is D. $7.20
Explanation:
From the question above, we were given:
Annual demand = 100,000 units
Production = 4 hour cycle
d = 400 per day (250 days per year)
p = 4000 units per day
H = $40 per unit per year
Q = 200
We will be using the EPQ or Q formula to calculate the cost setup, thus:
Q = √(2Ds/H) . √(p/(p-d)
200=√(2x400x250s/40 . √(4000/(4000-400)
200=√5,000s . √1.11
By squaring both sides, we have:
40,000=5,550s
s=40,000/5,550
s=7.20
C. follow a pathway toward a career goal.
Hope that helped :)
Answer:
$5,500 USD
Explanation:
Since traditional Roth IRA accounts cannot be owned jointly, then both individuals must have their own account. That being said they can still contribute to each other's Roth IRA accounts on behalf of their spouse. You can contribute a total of 100% of your earned income up to a limit of $5,500 USD. Pensions are not allowed as contributions. Individual's over the age of 50 have a limit of $6,500
A- The net earnings of the individual in question will be $710000 after the individual's claim for loss by fire is settled by the insurance company. B- Yes, he would buy the insurance if he were risk neutral.
C- Yes, the individual will buy the insurance policy if he were a expected utility maximizer as he would want to claim complete settlement of this amount to be claimed in case of fire loss.
- The expected net earnings from the insurance after deducting the amount from the premium paid and total claim endorsed by the insurance company will be $710000 which can be shown as below
We get,
- If the individual were risk neutral he would like to take the insurance as the risk of fire in the example given above is 0.5 which is greater than zero and this ultimately implies that <u>risk cannot be taken.</u>
- In the case if the individual is expected utility maximizer he would take the insurance as it would not only give him the claims from losses due to fire but also help him secure his house against beta of fire.
Hence, the correct answers will be A- $710000; B- Yes.; C- Yes. and imply that taking insurance will be a wise decision by the individual.
To know more about insurance policy , click the link below.
brainly.com/question/24984403
