Answer:
A Tying Contract
Explanation:
If a seller requires an intermediary to purchase a supplementary product to qualify to purchase the primary product the intermediary wishes to buy, it results in a tying contract. It is mostly treated as an illegal because it pushes  intermediary organization to buy other products if they wishes to purchase the products which is actually needed to be purchased. Some companies make it compulsory for their intermediaries in doing so. For example, if you have to buy 10 packs of Lays, then you must be buying 5 extra boxes of Pepsi as well. It is being done because of the power and market share that company is enjoying in the market, so they take its advantage. 
 
        
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Cost of merchandise sold = $ 28 
Gross profit = $ 13
The ending inventory under the LIFO method = $ 18
Explanation:
Given:
October 5,
Purchased units =  1 
Unit cost = $5
on October  12,
Purchased units = 1
Unit cost = $ 13
On October 28,
Purchased unit = 1
Unit cost = $ 15
Total cost of the 3 units purchased = $33
Now, the unit sold on October 31 will be the unit purchased in the end i.e on October 28
thus,
Cost of merchandise sold = $ 28 
Gross profit = Selling price of the unit - Unit price of purchase
or
Gross profit = $ 28 - $ 15 = $ 13
now, the ending inventory under the LIFO method = $ 5 + $ 13 = $ 18
 
        
                    
             
        
        
        
I would say Sir/ma'am it seems that we are out of stock on that certain item. You can order online the item that you want. If not then can I have your name or phone number to tell you when we have that item again.
Hope this helps :3
        
                    
             
        
        
        
Answer:
Explanation:
Given information
Number of shares owned = 200 shares
Split ratio = 2 for 1
Number of additional shares = 200 shares
The additional shares would get when the investor received the new certificate which specifies the additional shares plus the old certificate is also with the investor which decreased the par value of each share.  
It is a cheaper method as compare to cancel the shares plus issuing them
 
        
             
        
        
        
The answer to your question is B.