The statement "life course epidemiologists investigate how neighborhoods, racial discrimination, and poverty influence a person's health." False
This is further explained below.
<h3>What is
racial discrimination?</h3>
Generally, A person is said to engage in racial discrimination if they treat another person unfavorably because of the person's skin color, racial or ethnic background, or both.
People are able to engage in discriminatory behavior when they choose not to engage in economic activity with, interact with, or share resources with members of a certain group.
In conclusion, According to the statement, "life cycle epidemiologists research how communities, racial prejudice, and poverty impact a person's health." False
Read more about racial discrimination
brainly.com/question/23186993
#SPJ1
<span>The answer is yes. A casual friendship is one that may come and go. It benefits each individual because they explore different points of view, learn to respect differences, and determine whether or not to be a leader or follower.</span>
Answer:Political Theory
Explanation:
Political Theory
Political Theory is where we can get to actual grasp what politics is about in terms of freedom, individuality , democracy and justice
It is political science that helps us explore how a world of politic may look like and how we can reach that.
So it usually evaluates our current political system and find any faulty areas that we may need to pay attention on. It gives us a reflection of what our politics look like which engages us as citizens and create an interaction with our politic.
A) a barter system that does not rely on money or other currency.
Answer: A. Stare decisis
Explanation: Stare decisis simply means aligning with precedence. Stare decisis is a legal culture which necessitates the court to look into preceeding cases when making rulings on similar cases. It obligates the court that when making ruling on a certain cases, rulings preceeding cases of similar nature, fact and structure must be considered.
Therefore, in the scenario given, the court is following legal precedent set by the ruling of a previous case in other to make decision on a current case. Therefore, the second case is an example of stare decisis.