It is not fair in my opinion, because the 50 year old has already lived a life, where as the 20 year old hasn't. The 50 year old has already has done things in his or her life that the 20 year old won't be able to do. For example, when the 20 year old gets out of jail he will be 80 meaning he may never experience things such as getting married, having children, and etc. The 50 year old may have already done those things in his or her life, so it is very unfair to the 20 year old. The sentencing is also unfair due to the fact being both of them committed the crime and should have the same time served in jail.
Hint: that the last sentence might not hold up due to the fact of what he or she did and it pertains to how serve the crime was for both parties. Such as one person killed someone, while the other one didn't pull the trigger but was an accomplice or new about the killing. So it really depends on the crime or crimes the person has committed.
Answer:
C. greatly intense in spirit or feeling.
Explanation:
they show passion and enthusiasm so therefore C would be the best answer in this case scenario
Answer:
The answer is: transference.
Explanation:
The concept of transference is central to Freud's theory and its therapeutic approach. It illustrates the process in which the patient projects his unresolved feelings, usually about one of his main caregivers, the mother or the father, onto the analyst (therapist).
This process is central to psychoanalisis because it can be used as an instrument to resolve and overcome ailments that can be hidden very deep in the unconscious and for which simply talking about such feelings is not enough; however, it can also provoke hostil attitudes towards the therapist.
Honestly it’s kinda just a miss or hit with indirect democracy but how I see it I think it’s good because there’s an elected official that represents the majority of the peoples voices these officials represent the citizens' ideas and concerns in government
