Yes, i believe it will.
The reason why people goes to the cities in the first place is mostly to find more jobs available for them.
But due to the development of technology, a company could even give the job to countries outside our own with the help of online spread sheets or other type of software, which make people more likely to find work-life balance at rural areas rather than living in the cities.
The characteristics of Native Americans in SC were:
- Built wattle and daubs with thatched roofs for shelter - Cherokee
- Lived along the Southereastern coast line of SC - Yamasee
- Known as the River people - Catawba
- Had 2 chiefs - Cherokee
- Matrilineal leadership - Cherokee, Yamasee, Catawba
<h3>What were the characteristics of South Carolina tribes?</h3>
The Cherokee built wattle and dubs with thatched roofs and these was their main form of shelter. They also had two chiefs in each village which was a Red Chief and a White Chief.
The Yamasee people lived along the coast but it was the Catawba that were called the people of the river. All three tribes practiced matrilineal leadership before the Europeans came.
Find out more on the Native American matrilineal leadership at brainly.com/question/15283647
#SPJ1
As Weber identified various characteristics of bureaucracy in order to provide a standard for measuring how bureaucratic an actual organization is, he called this standard an <u>ideal type</u>.
<h3>What is a bureaucracy?</h3>
It refers to an administrative, government or social system with a hierarchical structure, complex rules and regulations.
Weber theory of Bureaucracy suggest that business tasks must be divided among the employees and the basis for the division of tasks should be competencies and functional specializations. In this way, the workers will be well aware of their role and worth in the organization and what is expected of them.
Read more about bureaucracy
brainly.com/question/12430754
#SPJ1
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
Indeed, global warming has been in the foreground of politics and science for quite some time. There have been numerous studies conducted on the effects of global warming and what we might do to mitigate any threats. I think some policymakers are wary of the findings and some can trust that the conclusions are sound for the following reason.
Politicians are wary because, in reality, there are no 100% conclusive arguments that confirm that global warming is the result of humans. For other politicians, the evidence provided by environmental institutions is valid and they are prompt to proclaim that humans are to blame for global warming.
What is real, is that earth scientists think that global warming caused significant climate change in the past. And when they say the past, they mean a time before humans appeared on planet earth.
Climate change or global warming is not new for planet earth. It is a phenomenon that has happened in the past according to scientists and national agencies. It is believed that global warming had caused natural disasters such as the melting of ice caps and the flooding of many lands on Earth, destroying life forms.
That is why right now, many agencies are closely researching climate change. Among those institutions are the US National Academy of Sciences, the Geological Society of America, the American Meteorological Society, and the National Aeronautics and Space Administration.
In general, Republicans tend to take a more conservative stand on issues. They believe that the federal government should not play a big role in people's lives. Most Republicansfavor lower taxes and less government spending on social programs. Theybelieve in less government intervention in business and the economy
