She lived a very extravagant lifestyle and wasn't shy about it while her
people in France were living in poverty. The thing that pushed for
rebellion was when asked what they should do about the starving people
she answered rhetorically with let them eat cake.
Hope this helps!!
Answer: This is a " WORD-FOR-WORD PLAGIARISM".
Explanation: Word-for-word plagiarism is a type of plagiarism were someone copies another person's work word-for-word, without acknowledging the source it is been copied from.
The student has copied the original source word-for-word without acknowledging the source. The word been copied is "where variables are measured separately and then a mathematical model is chosen to portray the relationship among the variables". Which is the same in both version.
Though the student has used it in a different form to describe and define a different context from the main source. It is still plagiarism, because the student has copied it from the main source without acknowledgement
Answer:
New France is all the land in North America - from up into Canada down to new Orleans - that the French claimed. From whom did French settlers first learn about the Mississippi River? ... When La Salle reached the mouth of the Mississippi, he shouted "long live the King!" and claimed the entire River valley for France.
Explanation:
Answer:
Values can influence our language.
Explanation:
Values is a core or fundamental part of culture. Values can simply be said to be the beliefs you have. What you believe in will affect the way you talk or express yourself or opinion. In terms of social psychology, values affect or determines the way we interact with others or define things. Just like the example giving in the question where one call someone engaged in guerrilla warfare a terrorist rather than a freedom fighter another example is that of you believing that one Political party is much more better than the other political party.
In 2013, the Supreme Court made a ruling in the Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin case that the college must show compelling evidence that racial preferences are justified as one of the admissions criteria.
<h3>In Davis v. UT Austin, what decision did the Supreme Court make?</h3>
In Davis v. the University of Texas at Austin (Fisher), the U.S. Supreme Court (the "Court") decided on June 23, 2016, by a vote of 4-3 that the university's race-conscious admissions policy complied with the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In its 2013 decision in Davis v. Texas, which remanded the case to the Fifth Circuit, the Supreme Court set high requirements for affirmative action policies, saying that colleges could only take race into account when making admissions decisions if they could provide a "reasoned, principled explanation" for wanting a diverse student body.
To know more about University of Texas refer to: brainly.com/question/2437326
#SPJ4
