For this question, it would be most effective to use an algebraic expression to more easily show what the question is asking. If we use the variable "k" to show the distance in km that he cycled on Sunday, we know that the amount he cycled on Saturday equals k + 12, and the amount that he cycled on the weekend should be the amount of Saturday plus the amount of Sunday. If we write this as an equation we say:
k + k + 12 = 38
=> 2k + 12 = 38
Now we can just rearrange and solve for k:
=> 2k = 26
=> k = 26/2 = 13
Therefore Patrick cycled 13km on Sunday
To solve the answer, we just add 12km to the value for Sunday like so:
12 + 13 = the amount he cycled on Sunday
Hope this helped, remember to please try and understand the maths as well as the answer :))
Answer:
1
Step-by-step explanation:
6=3+3p
6-3=3p
3=3p
3/3=p
1=p
Well just plug the two points in... y=7 x=2
3(7) + 2= 5
is that true or not?
3(7)
21
21+2= 23
23 is not equal to 5... so no it does not pass through the point (2,7)
Answer:
Yolanda is correct.
Step-by-step explanation:
If Hazel has $23.28 and $5.60 more than Nixon, then Nixon will have $17.68 because 23.28-5.60 is 17.68.
The only way Paul would be right is if Nixon has $5.60 more than Hazel because 23.28+5.60 is 28.88.
