Answer:
Maybe c) is the answer cuz they didn't take any action regarding this issue
Answer: d. All of the above
Explanation:
Some crimes are quite complicated in structure to solve as they leave little evidence to enable the police to capitalize on and solve.
Police response is also reactive which means that they cannot prevent crime per say, they can only try to solve it. This puts them at a disadvantage because they are essentially a step behind the criminals which means they have to do more to catch up than the criminal has to do to escape.
Police powers are also quite limited especially in a democratic nation like the United States because they have to abide by certain rules. For instance, if a search and seizure is illegal, regardless of if incriminating evidence is found, the criminal has a good chance of being freed. These rules make solving crimes difficult sometimes because some crimes cannot be solved conventionally.
She is guilty of solicitation.
Congress attempted to grant this power to the president by the Line Item Veto Act of 1996.
<u>
Explanation:
</u>
The congress of the United States of America has granted certain powers to the president to nullify the part of the bill and that is called line item veto. This can also be termed as partial veto.
The line item veto will give powers to the president to cancel certain provision in the bill and namely budget appropriation bill without vetoing the entire legislative bill.
Supreme Court of America as ruled that it is unconstitutional and it stated that Line Item Veto Act of 1996 has violated the fundamental principle of the presidential clause of the constitution.
