1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
irinina [24]
3 years ago
8

Who has chegg please answer i need answers​

Law
1 answer:
sukhopar [10]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

What?

I need answers

You might be interested in
What does “being a witness against themself” mean?
beks73 [17]

Answer:

When being a witness against themselves it means They don’t have to give any results regarding them I think that’s what it means I’m not sure look it up

5 0
2 years ago
A homeowner was injured when an automatic cutoff switch failed to function on a snowblower he was using. The cutoff switch had f
KatRina [158]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

Because the homeowner failed to give the mechanic the manual so the mechanic fixed it without knowing the correct way as it would say in the manual.

7 0
2 years ago
You are driving in the left lane on a multi-lane expressway, and are moving a bit faster than other traffic. A speeding car come
egoroff_w [7]

Answer:

driving in the right lane

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The notion that crime is caused by social disorganization is a belief of
gizmo_the_mogwai [7]

Answer:

OB PO

CRIMINAL ANTHROPOLOGY

Explanation:

PLEASE

BRAINLY ME

THANKS

6 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Assume that the state legislature of Kansas passes a law providing that confessions are admissible in state court criminal cases
avanturin [10]

This law is unlikely to be constitutional.

The Miranda warning is a type of notification that is given to criminal suspects who are in custody. This warning advises them of their right to remain silent, and that they are allowed to refuse answering questions or providing information to authorities. A case precedent that would support this instance is <em>Berkemer v. McCarty (1984)</em>. In this case, it was established that a person stopped, even for a misdemeanour, should receive the protections of the Fifth Amendment once in custody, regardless of how serious the offense is.

3 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Idk if anyone will see this, but if you do, message me asap so i can get you to call 911 for me?
    13·2 answers
  • Is it a violation of the U.S Constitution for a defense attorney to not cross-examine the witness?
    12·1 answer
  • Describe your work habits and work quality this semester. Did you always show your best work? Did you challenge yourself this se
    14·1 answer
  • What was the effect of the passage of the 18th amendment to the united states constitution on alcohol consumption?
    7·1 answer
  • What is spontaneous desistance​
    7·1 answer
  • Whats the difference between reasonable suspicion and probable cause?​
    11·1 answer
  • Match each US political idea to the document it was borrowed from.
    8·1 answer
  • Hiiiiiiiiiii how are yall doing and how is your day
    15·1 answer
  • While driving, you see this pavement marking painted on the road ahead, in your lane. This
    7·2 answers
  • What evidences was found in “Bones S03E04 The Secret in the Soil”?
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!