Answer:
His return on investment is negative 8.7%
Explanation:
Thomas purchased 2,500 shares of EKK at $54 per share (=$135,000 / 2,500).
He received $750 (= $0.30 x 2,500) in annual dividends.
He sold his 2,500 shares at $49 per share = $122,500
The total amount of money he received from his investment is $122,500 + $7
50 = $123,250, then we divide that by $135,000 = 0.913 - 1 = -8.7%
Answer:
$47,000
Explanation:
Cedar Grove Industries CVP Income Statement for Month Ending May, 2017
Total Per Unit
Sales ($49×7,600) $372,400 49
Less Variable Cost
($28×7,300) $204,400 28
Contribution Margin $168,000 21
Less Fixed Cost$121,000
Net Income (loss)$47,000
Keeping the boat you are riding clean is the most fundamental responsibility to do in order to maintain the structure and efficiency of the watercraft. In addition, its hull is at most important to be cleaned using detergents. Among this type of detergent that is commonly used in cleaning would be a non-phosphate detergent.
Answer:
b. The lower the WACC used to calculate it, the lower the calculated NPV will be
Explanation:
When calculating NPV the cash inflows and cash outflows arising at the duration of the life are discounted at WACC. Generally, present value of outflow is same as actual as no discounting is done, as that occurs at the initial time of the project.
Cash inflows arising at year end are discounted.
When, WACC is lower The present value of inflows is lower in comparison to higher WACC.
Therefore, there is lower NPV with lower WACC.
Thus, Statement b. is correct.
b. The lower the WACC used to calculate it, the lower the calculated NPV will be
<u>Answer: </u>
Benefits are amplified at a point where the minor income efficiency (MRP) is equivalent to the expense of employing a security watch. In this way, a benefit expanding firm will enlist as long as the MRP is more noteworthy than the wages or the expense of recruiting a security monitor.
On the off chance that I need to amplify benefit, at that point I won't enlist the security monitor at a compensation pace of $20 in light of the fact that the expense of recruiting is more noteworthy than the expansion to the complete income or MRP, which is equivalent to $15 (expecting that the security watchman will kill shoplifting).
The above examination shows that a security watchman will be paid a compensation rate for every hour, which is equivalent to the sum spared every hour by the security monitor for wiping out the normal shoplifting every hour.
The sum spared is an expansion to the all out income, and no benefit boosting firm would pay a compensation rate higher than the augmentations to the complete income.
