The state legislature could have refused to implement the decision, leading to a crisis in the legitimacy of the Supreme Court's authority.
Baker v. Carr (1962) is the U.S. Preferred court docket case that held that federal courts should hear cases alleging that a state's drawing of electoral obstacles, i.E. Redistricting, violates the identical safety Clause of the Fourteenth modification of the charter.
Carr, 369 U.S. 186 (1962), became a landmark USA ideal court docket case in which the court held that redistricting qualifies as a justiciable question beneath the Fourteenth Amendment, therefore enabling federal courts to hear Fourteenth amendment-based totally redistricting instances.
Learn more about legislature here brainly.com/question/809346
#SPJ4
Answer:
self-serving bias
Explanation:
self-serving bias is the behavioral approach of human in which they take credit for all the positive event related to them while blaming external agents for any negative events happening to them.
Example: If one score good marks they attribute it to their hard work
while if one get less marks they blame it on the teacher.
Since the statement above says one overestimated ones value for success and attributes failures to externals agents they are showing a self serving bias behavioral tendency
It is important for the citizens to check multiple sources when learning about a political event through the media as Different news outlets may emphasize different parts of a story.
Explanation:
Even though media is a very powerful tool for the people to know what political events are taking place in the country or the world , It is also biased in favor of some political parties over the others.
Every media , be it a news channel or a social media, is biased towards some party or the other and most of the media coverage, is towards the one that they favor.
Thus, The citizens will not get a complete picture of the political event , as every media covers news and segments more of the party that they favor.
Hence, It is up to the citizens to follow multiple sources to find out what is the true picture of the political event.
