Was Trench warfare the main method of fighting in World War I?

History

1 answer:

arlik [135]3 years ago

5 0

Answer:

Yes and no. It depends on the front. On the Western Front, the war was mainly in trenches and was not dynamic almost at all. It was quite static and trenches were constructed so that the troops had as much comfort in them as possible. On the Eastern front, there were also trenches but it was not that static and the army was on the move most of the time so no high-quality trenches were needed in the East. overall I would say that the trenches were the main method but it depends on the stage and front of the war.

You might be interested in

Who spoke against British rule in colonial times?

Cerrena [4.2K]

Answer: The correct answer is B. Patrick Henry

Explanation: Patrick Henry was an American lawyer, planter and orator well known for his declaration to the Second Virgina Convention (1775): "Give me liberty, or give me death". He definitely opossed to British rule.

8 0

3 years ago

how would you define the term "massacre"? How many people have to die in order for an event to be called a "massacre".

SpyIntel [72]

Answer:

Explanation:

Massacre: an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of people.

“an indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of many people” Many is of course “A large quantity”. So there we have it, certainly more than a couple but if it gets to be say 100,000, which is definitely a large number, I suspect that might be encroaching into the realms of genocide.

OK so if you happen upon a car crash and there are bodies spread over the scene, 2 from each of the 2 cars, then you would immediately spot, just by looking there were 4 people involved, but if it was a pair of coaches each with 52 passengers and they were all spread around the scene you wouldn’t be able to put a number to it by just sweeping your eyes across the mess, perhaps then it is getting to be a massacre. Could that be a useful definition? If the number slaughtered is more than you can estimate merely with a look? I also think it needs to be within a definable area, like a football field, or a stadium or perhaps a town. If it involved a whole region of a country then it becomes Genocide, maybe.

Could it be then The indiscriminate and brutal slaughter of more people within a definable area than you can estimate readily with a sweep of your eyes.

Just a suggestion, so go gently on me ………….

6 0

3 years ago

A case can arrive at the Supreme Court through each of these ways except _____.

Lyrx [107]

Answer:

attorney

Explanation:

5 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Why did winning just the northern states

ICE Princess25 [194]

Answer:

In United States election, before an election can be successfully declared won and finished, one of the candidate needs to win the higher number of the electoral votes irrespective of whether he or she won the popular votes.

Lincoln winning the northern states only guarantees that he would secure the majority is as a result of those northern states having the majority of the electoral college votes ascribed to them irrespective of the size and population of those states.

<em> Hence the reason Lincoln won with a margin 212–21 in the electoral college votes.</em>

Explanation:

4 0

3 years ago

What type of democracy was observed by citizens of Athens?

kifflom [539]

Answer:

Explanation:

5 0

2 years ago