Louis Zamperini does not break. He withstands all of the pressure placed upon him and he never breaks. He is put under the most intense of forces in the most brutal of situations. He is physically, intellectually, emotionally, and psychologically tested. Forged through such trials, he does not break. He is unbroken. He withstands the challenges placed upon him. The title is a reflection of his characterization throughout an ordeal which would have broken many others. Given how Hillenbrand develops his narrative, it becomes evident how Louis Zamperini had always remained "unbroken." He fights through adversity and challenges throughout his life. Zamperini represents the essence of toughness and a steely will that enables him to endure most anything. The adversity of distance running does not break him, nor does the loss of his dream competing in the Olympic games. His work as a fighter pilot tests him, but he never capitulates as he shows success in this realm, as well. Being shot out of an airplane, surrounded by sharks and swimming for his life did not break him. Being a prisoner of war on "Execution Island" failed to break him, as well. The abuse Louie suffered as "prisoner number one" is gruesome and brutal. However, his resolve did not break. The emotional challenges of both returning to civilian life and having to confront health issues that endangered his chances of running again also failed to break him. In the end, his endurance and strength to simply persevere is what makes him "unbroken."When examining the title of the work, I feel that it is a direct reflection of the main character. Describing all that Louie endured and the challenges he faced and being able to say that he remained "unbroken" from them represents an act of strength in mere verbal articulation. To have experienced such a reality enables the individual to grasp why Hildebrand chose such a descriptor to fit Louie and the life he led.
The correct answer is expanded into southern India to control trade routes
Explanation: Chandragupta had a true empire that stretched from the Indus to the Ganges, dominated the delta of these two rivers, and was supported by a mighty army. The administrative organization seems to have been well undertaken, overseen by imperial inspectors, and facilitated by the good state of the roads which the sovereign had taken great care of. It was no longer a question for Seleucus to despise the alliance of such a powerful monarch: he left his territories beyond the Indus and bestowed on her the hand of a Greek princess. From that moment on, India entered the orbit of the great empires of time; its capital, situated in Pataliputra or Magadha, was for many decades the center of a Greek embassy which Ambassador Magastenio illustrated, and whose information is precious, though secondhand.
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although the question does not provide options, we can say the following.
The factor that led to this last-minute strategy change was that the public demanded the Navy to protect Florida from a Spanish attack.
Prior to the start of the Spanish-American War, the U.S. Navy had formulated a strategic plan for weakening Spain in both the Philippines and Cuba. These plans were not implemented as intended. Last-minute changes seriously threatened the effectiveness of the strategy in the Caribbean due to the above-mentioned reason.
With the victory of the United States Navy over the Spaniard Navy in 1898, Spain ended its colonial presence in the Caribbean. Finally, Cuba got its independence. As a result of its victory, the United States took possession of the Philippines, Puerto Rico, and the island of Guam. The Treaty of Paris officially ended the Spanish-American War.
