Through much of the nineteenth century, Great Britain avoided the kind of social upheaval that intermittently plagued the Continent between 1815 and 1870. Supporters of Britain claimed that this success derived from a tradition of vibrant parliamentary democracy. While this claim holds some truth, the Great Reform Bill of 1832, the landmark legislation that began extending the franchise to more Englishmen, still left the vote to only twenty percent of the male population. A second reform bill passed in 1867 vertically expanded voting rights, but power remained in the hands of a minority--property-owning elites with a common background, a common education, and an essentially common outlook on domestic and foreign policy. The pace of reform in England outdistanced that of the rest of Europe, but for all that remained slow. Though the Liberals and Conservatives did advance different philosophy on the economy and government in its most basic sense, the common brotherhood on all representatives in parliament assured a relatively stable policy-making history.
Sorry it's so long but that's the answer toy your question...Hope this helps:)
Answer:
I believe that it should be "bad eating habits"
During Reconstruction, groups such as the Ku Klux Klan...
used violence to prevent freed people from voting.
In the Emancipation Proclamation, President Lincoln declared all slaves who lived in states rebelling
<span>
against the government were free.</span>
<span>The formal amendment process is an excellent example of the concepts of federalism and popular sovereignty. The formal amendment process includes the physical change in actual in the Constitution wording. It is one of the two ways to propose an amendment to the Constitution and the other one is the Informal amendment.</span>
