The Supreme Court decision in Miranda v. Arizona, 384 US 436 (1966)<span> required (for the first time) that someone accused of a crime be </span>informed<span> of his or her constitutional rights prior to interrogation. This protected the rights of the accused, or the defendant, in two new ways: 1) It educated the person about relevant constitutional rights; and 2) It inhibited law enforcement officials from infringing those rights by applying the Exclusionary Rule to any testimony/incriminating statements the defendant made unless he intentionally waived his rights. </span>
<span>The Exclusionary Rule prohibits evidence or testimony obtained illegally or in violation of the constitution from being used against the defendant in court. </span>
<span>The </span>Miranda<span> ruling has been revised somewhat by subsequent Supreme Court decisions. On June 1, 2010, the Roberts' Court released the opinion for </span>Berghuis v. Thompkins,<span> 08-1470 (2010), which held a defendant must </span>invoke<span> his right to remain silent (by stating he wants to remain silent), rather than </span>waive<span>it (by explicitly agreeing to answer questions before interrogation). </span>
The early railroad provided a means of transportation for people and goods faster and more efficiently <span />
Provided economic aid to Europe = Marshall Plan
Outlined that ways to contain communism = Truman Doctrine
Approved the partition of Palestine = United Nations
Strengthened Soviet control over Eastern Europe = Warsaw Pack
Answer:
There were also things that put the South at a disadvantage. One of the main weaknesses was their economy. They did not have factories like those in the North. They could not quickly make guns and other supplies that were needed.
nation:
The court packing plan was a judicial procedure reform bill that occured in teh 1973, this was a legistlative proposed by President Franklin Roosevelt to add more justices to teh U.S. supreme court... Hope this helped
