Let's think of it like this. We have an energy crisis, but how can we solve it? There are three steps. First, we need to recognize that we HAVE a problem that needs to be fixed. Then, we need to determine what's causing the problem. Finally, we need to change how we act in order to solve the problem. Now, let's look at the options.
Is A correct, leaving our behavior unchanged? NO: if we know the cause of the problem, we still need to solve it! What about B: the problems are ignored? NO: you can't solve a problem unless you know it's a problem. C? NO: to solve a problem, you need to find out what's causing it. Finally, let's look at D: behavior is changed after cause is identified. This is correct: not only do we know why it's happening, but we're fixing it!
Answer: D
Answer:
b. making an observation and asking a question
Explanation:
In scientific method there need to be a situation to be study. In this description, the scientist first observed that in a certain region there is some kind of trees and the other variable is the great amount of deer.
After making different observations, and some research of other areas similar to the one that is study, she is asking what is the relation among the animals and the trees.
The next step will be to formulate a hypothesis using all the data and the two variables that she observed.
Answer:The Bald Eagle’s prey would increase dramatically because there is less/nothing to eat the species.
Explanation:
Answer:
I would say the second one.
Explanation:
I'm sorry if it's wrong
