Answer:
<u>Predatory pricing</u>
Explanation:
A "predator" refers to an animal who survives by "preying" on other animals.
Predatory pricing in a similar sense refers to that form of excessively low pricing which in a way consumes other firms by taking away their share of industry revenues. Such form of pricing is considered illegal and is against healthy competition.
Such pricing eliminates competitors from the market and gradually leads to emergence of a monopoly i.e supremacy of a single firm in the whole industry and thus considered an illegal practice.
In the given case, the retail chain can be alleged to have followed predatory pricing which is substantiated by the fact that it cuts it's prices excessively i.e even below cost , thereby forcing smaller companies to exit the industry.
What are the options and I’ll tell you when you comment on mine when
JEBBERZ that link isn't even clickable
Answer:
<u>smaller deficit</u>.
Explanation:
A smaller deficit than the current deficit is the ideal answer to fill the gap. A deficit occurs when expenditures are greater than revenues, so in an economy with a surplus, revenues will be larger than expenses, so the standardized employment deficit will be smaller than the current one, because an economy with a GDP that exceeds its potential , is an economy that is expanding, production is larger, which consequently increases the employment rate and decreases the deficit.
Answer:
b. performing an experiment in an economic system.
Explanation:
In contrast to scientific experimentation, whereby connections and differences can be measured between two or more variables. In economics, theory and observation are more difficult than in sciences such as physics due to the difficulty in performing an experiment in an economic system, as human beings' opinions change over time, due to dynamism in human society.
Hence, in this case, the correct answer is option
