People settled in Delaware for 2 reasons mostly. One was that Delaware accepted different religions without any discrimination. The second was that the land itself was rich with nutrients and similar things and was great for having farms.
Scarcity is the fundamental challenge that all individuals and nations must confront. Everyone faces some limitations, so we all have to make choices where we limit or allow ourselves to something.
Economists generally recognize four types of economic systems traditional, traditional, command, market and mixed.
A traditional economic system is shaped by tradition. The work that people do, the goods and services they provide, how they exchange resources… all tend to follow a pattern. The traditional system is bad at addressing scarcity because scarcity is formed off of new requirements people have through the ages and a traditional system would not evolve just as our requirements would.
In a planned economy, the government controls the economy. The state decides how to use and distribute resources. The government regulates prices and wages; it may even determine what sorts of work individuals do.
Socialism is a prime example of a planned economy. Socialism does not work because it is not consistent with the fundamental principles of human behavior. The failure of socialism in countries around the world can be traced to one critical defect: it is a system that ignores incentives.
Market economies allow all economic decisions to be made by individuals. The unrestrained interactions between individuals and companies in the marketplace determine what happens to all the good and resources.Individuals choose how to invest their personal resources and individuals decide what to consume. Within a pure market economy, the government is entirely absent from economic affairs.
A mixed economic system combines elements of the market and command economy. Many economic decisions are made in the market by individuals. But the government also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources.
If scarcity is looked at on a macro level, the best economic system is mixed because it allows the government to also plays a role in the allocation and distribution of resources, while the individuals still stay happy because they have some control. The only problem is the eternal question of what the right mix between the public and private sectors of the economy should be.
There is no point to look at it on a micro level because almost no country is small enough to be considered on that level.
Answer:
Option 1 , Africa
Explanation:
The complete question is
The graph shows the distribution of world population in 2000.
Pie chart showing distribution of world population in 2000. Asia is 60.5 percent. Africa 13.4 percent. Europe 11.9 percent. Latin America and Caribbean 8.5 percent. North America 5.2 percent. Oceania 0.5 percent.
Based on the graph, which area is closest in population size to Europe?
-
Africa
- Oceania
- North America
- Latin America and Caribbean
Solution
Population of Europe in 2000 was 11.9 % of the total world's population and Population of Africa in 2000 was 13.4 % of the total's world population.
Rest all have the following composition
North America - 5.2% of the total's world population
Latin America and Caribbean - 8.5% of the total's world population
Oceania - 0.5 % of the total's world population
Thus, Africa has population closest to the population of Europe.
Hence, option 1 is correct
You're the second person that has asked this haha so I'm going to give you what I gave the other person :) Hope this helps!
Explanation:
Millions of children are forced to face violence and hardships over something that they don't have control over. Many children are born into a society in which violence is more than common and many of them are hurt, abused, and starved for no reason. They have no control over their situation and many parents find escape as their only way to get their children to safety. The United States of America is more than able to take in innocent children and families, provide care, keep them safe, and allow them to have a safe life like every other citizen. Allowing children and families from harmful countries to come to the U.S and become citizens in order for them to stay would cause no harm. Not only would it make the U.S a better place and have a better title, but it would help many families that have nowhere to go. Millions of children can be provided with an education, food, and shelter. Sending children and families back to a violent and unsafe society is not the right way to deal with things, they should be helped, if not staying in the U.S then at least sent somewhere where they don't have to fear losing their loved ones.
