The ethical relativism principle represents that there is no means to identify between right and wrong in morality, while the moral relativism principle declares that there is no manner to differentiate between right and wrong in morality.
<h3>What is ethical and Moral relativism?</h3>
Morality is said to be relative to one's culture's norms, according to ethical relativism. To put it another way, the moral rules of the society in which a process is carried out decide whether it is proper or wrong.
A morally correct behavior in one civilization may be ethically incorrect in another. Acceptance of a fact-value gap has driven most kinds of ethical non-cognitivism, such as moral relativism.
Moral relativism, unlike ethical non-cognitivism, does not deny that moral assertions can be true; rather, it denies that they can be made true by an objective, transcultural moral order.
Therefore, the ethical and Moral relativism are the correct answers of the given problem.
Learn more about the morality, refer to:
brainly.com/question/13324831
#SPJ1
Answer:
E) Yield to maturity < Coupon rate
Explanation:
As we all know that:
Bond's Yield = Coupon Payments / Market Price
If the market price has exceeded from the par value then the yield of bond will eventually fall from the previous level. In other words, as market value of bond is directly proportional to the coupon payments so we can say that the coupon rate increases the value of the bond.
Hence
Coupon rate > Yield to maturity (If the market value is above par value)
If we change the sign, we have:
Yield to maturity < Coupon rate (Which is the option E)
The form of financial exchange Erik uses is B. currency.
