Answer:
Gram falls unconscious, and Sal and Gramps rush her to the hospital in Coeur D'Alene, where the doctors tell them that Gram has had a stroke. Despite the protests of the doctors, Gramps refuses to leave her side for even a second. Sal, reflecting on grandfather's emotions, wonders if he suspects the snakebite caused the stroke and blames himself for taking her to the river. Sal realizes then that just as Gramps should not blame himself for Gram's illness, so she cannot blame herself for her mother's miscarriage. She then recalls the process through which their dog weaned her puppies: though the beagle was protective and caring when the puppies were first born, after a few months, she roughly pushed them away. Sal's mother had explained to Sal that the mother dog wanted her puppies to be able to take care of themselves in case something happened to her, and Sal realizes that in a way, her mother's trip to Lewiston was her way of trying to make Sal more able to take care of herself. Later that night, Gramps tells Sal that he must stay with Gram, but hands her the car keys and all his money, tacitly giving her permission to drive to Lewiston herself.
Explanation:
Answer: Hecate is angry because the 3 witches have made prophecies to Macbeth without telling her.
Answer:
I'd imagine the correct answer is<em> the third one</em>, "The story illustrates that growing up can be a painful experience".
Explanation:
Well, numbers 2 and 4 just explain the story's setting, they don't really demonstrate the story's main theme or lesson. Number 1 is, like, super vague as well. Like, it could be describing a million different stories. Number 3, however, <u>displays the story's main theme</u> and has a statement that <u>can be backed up with evidence</u> from that story. So, the sentence that best shows a strong thesis statement is the third statement.
D Jupiter should be capitalized because it's the name of something.
Answer:
A. All applicants must pass a test. Claire is an applicant, so she must pass a test.
Explanation:
Deductive reasoning can be defined as a type of logical reasoning that typically involves drawing conclusions from one or more premises (factual statements) that are assumed to be true generally.
Basically, deductive reasoning starts with a general statement, idea or hypothesis (All applicants must pass a test; Claire is an applicant.) and reaches a specific logical conclusion (so she must pass a test.).
Hence, the option which is an example of deductive reasoning is; All applicants must pass a test. Claire is an applicant, so she must pass a test.
In conclusion, deductive reasoning is highly based on drawing an inference and reaching a logical conclusion from one or more premises. An inference is an act or process which typically involves a person deducing the meaning or message from something through induction.
