Answer:
The PV of future cash flow is $22,925,764, therefore the company should take on the project
Explanation:
In order to know if the company should take on the project we have to calculate the PV of future cash flow as follows:
PV of future cash flow=<u> D1 </u>
RE-g
To calculate this formula we requre to calculate the WACC and the discount rate as follows:
WACC=(1.00/1.80×0.11)+0+(0.80/1.80×0.046)
WACC=0.0611+0+0.02044
WACC=0.081556
WACC=8.16%
After having calculated the WACC we can calculate the project discount rate as follows:
project discount rate=WACC + Additional risk factor
=8.16%+3%
=11.16%
Therefore, PV of future cash flow= <u>$2,100,000</u>
0.1116-0.02
PV of future cash flow= <u>$2,100,000</u>
0.0916
PV of future cash flow=$22,925,764
The PV of future cash flow is $22,925,764, therefore the company should take on the project
C. Private loan - a loan between two private parties can be set to whatever they want and is usually lower than the average that banks and other professional industries offer.
FYI - payday loans will have some of the highest interest rates of all loans.
Hope that helps
Answer:
B. Pass-through scheme.
Explanation:
Pass-through Billing: Pass-through billing schemes occur when a provider, such as a physician or hospital, pays a laboratory to perform their tests and then files the claims as though they had performed the tests themselves.
Answer: Step 1) Find share of market in the Portfolio
(11.5-3.5)x+3.5=6.5
8x=3
x=3/8
x=0.375
=37.5%
SD of market portfolio= 0.375x+0=9.5
x=9.5/0.375
=25.33%
correl = cov / (std 1 * std2)
0.4=COV/0.2533*0.545
COV= 0.2533*0.545*0.4=0.05
cov of 2 assets = b1 * b2 * variance of market
0.05=B1*1*0.2533^2
B of security=0.0032
Capm Model
3.5+0.0032(11.5-3.5)=3.5256% expected return
Explanation:
Step 1) Find the share of market in the portfolio in order to find market SD
Step 2) Find Covariance betweens security and market by using both SDS and correlation
Step 3) Find Beta of Security using Co variance
Step 4) Use the Beta in CAPM model in order to find expected return
Explanation:
Compare and Contrast ->
Roles of the federal government -> Promoter & Regulator of industrial growth
U.S.Government => Promoter & Regulator of industrial growth
Pacific Railway Act (1862)-They have been granted 20 square miles of land per 1 mile of the track laid down. It strongly encouraged the construction of transcontinental railway lines, contributing to five different transcontinental roads: Union Pacific RR, Central Pacific RR, South Pacific RR, North Pacific RR and the Great North. The Grants Act of Morrill Land (1862)-gave state free land.
U.S.Government => Roles of the federal government
Sherman Antitrust Act (1890)The purpose was to promote economic competition through the regulation of shares, cartels and monopolies. It was very uncompromisingly applied Interstate Trade Act (1887). It also prohibits discrimination against shippers and pays more on the same train for shorter routes than for longer routes.
Thesis:
In the 19th Century and in themid-19th Century, the government of the United States was much more a proponent of industrialisation then an industrialisation regulator than a regulator.
In the year 1862, for instance, congress took place on the Pacific Railway Act, which gave the railway lines 20 acres per mile. This eventually culminated in five transcontinental trains: Union Pacific Railways, Central Pacific Railways, North American Railways, South Pacific Railways, and the Great North.In end, this resulted in the creation of booming towns in the west, encouraging manufacturers to relocate to their inhabitants and enabling businesses to sell their products to remote locations that were once hard to reach. Congress also enacted Morrill's 1861 Tariff Act which substituted for a higher tariff for the limited import tariff inserted in 1816. This shielded businesses from foreign competitors and increased their profits so that they could increase their power. The US government in general has been a more aggressive manufacturing supporter.