All categories

4 years ago

Difference between compulsory and non-compulsory insurance

1 answer:

7 0

Compulsory insurance is a type of insurance that is required by law before you can engage in specific activities. This kind of insurance is meant to protect you from harm in some way, an example would be the legal requirement to have auto insurance to drive a car or having health insurance in the United States.

Non compulsory insurance is pretty much everything that you are not required to have, insurance such as travel insurance, life insurance, phone insurance, etc. Although it is a good idea to get these, they are not required.

Non compulsory basically means voluntary while compulsory means required.

You might be interested in

a perpetual bond with a par value of $1,000 and a semiannual coupon has a yield to maturity of 5.20% and a current price of $1,0

ycow [4]

Rate = 5.2% / 2 = 2.6%

Price = Semi annual coupon / Yield

1,055 = Semi annual coupon / 0.026

Semi annual coupon = 27.43

Annual coupon = 27.43 * 2 = 54.86

Current yield = (Coupon / price) * 100

Current yield = (54.86 / 1,055) * 100

Current yield = 5.20%

A perpetual bond, also regarded colloquially as a perpetual or perp, is a bond without a maturity date, consequently allowing it to be handled as equity, not as debt. Issuers pay coupons on perpetual bonds all the time, and they no longer ought to redeem the most important. Perpetual bond coin flows are, consequently, the ones of perpetuity.

A perpetual bond is a bond not using a maturity date that isn't always redeemable however can pay a regular circulate of interest for all time.

Maturity or maturity date is the date on which the very last fee is due on a loan or other financial device, consisting of a bond or term deposit, at which factor the major is because of being paid. Most devices have a hard and fast maturity date which is a particular date on which the device matures.

Learn more about Perpetual bonds here: brainly.com/question/14685796

#SPJ4

4 0

1 year ago

The Bradford Company issued 12% bonds, dated January 1, with a face amount of $87 million on January 1, 2021. The bonds mature o

kakasveta [241]

Answer:

1. $77,783,220

2. Jan-21

Dr Cash $ $77,783,220

Dr Discount On Bond $9,216,780

Cr Bond Payable $ $87,000,000

Explanation:

1. Calculation to Determine the price of the bonds at January 1, 2021.

First step is to calculate the Present Value Of Annual Interest

a Semi-annual Interest Amount $5,220,000

($87,000,000*12%/2)

b PV Annuity Factor for (20 Years,14%/2=7%) 10.5940

c Present Value Of Annual Interest (a*b) $ $55,300,680

($5,220,000*10.5940)

Second step is to calculate Present Value Of Redemption Amount

a Redemption Value $ $87,000,000

b PV Factor Of (20 Years,7%) 0.25842

c Present Value Of Redemption Amount (a*b) $ $22,482,540

($87,000,000*0.25842 )

Now let Determine the price of the bonds at January 1, 2021.

Intrinsic Value ( Price ) Of The Bond = ($55,300,680+$22,482,540)

Intrinsic Value ( Price ) Of The Bond =$77,783,220

Therefore the price of the bonds at January 1, 2021 is $77,783,220

2. Preparation of the journal entries to record their issuance by The Bradford Company on January 1, 2021,

Jan-21

Dr Cash $ $77,783,220

Dr Discount On Bond $9,216,780

($87,000,000-$77,783,220)

Cr Bond Payable $ $87,000,000

(Being to record issuance of bond)

3. Preparation of the journal entries to record their issuance by The Bradford Company on ion June 30, 2021

Jun-30

Dr Interest expenses $ 53,82,240

Discount On Bond payable $ 2,22,240

Cash $5,220,000

4.Preparation of the journal entries to record their issuance by The Bradford Company on

December 31, 2021

Dec-31 Interest expenses $ 53,97,797

Discount On Bond payable $ 2,37,797

Cash $5,220,000

( to record interest payment)

6 0

3 years ago

Roy dies and is survived by his wife, Marge. Under Roy’s will, all of his otherwise uncommitted assets pass to Marge. Based on t

tatiyna

Answer:

Explanation:

a.) R, M and M's sister A claims equivalent tenure in timberland worth $1.2 million. Despite the fact that A completed the first price tag, military conclusion is constrained to the degree of R's offer in Timberland. So military reasoning is $0.4 million (1/3 of $1.2 million)

Therefore, R's martial deduction is $0.4 million.

b.) Living arrangement worth $900,000 is claimed by R and M as occupants by the sum with right of survivor-ship. Despite the fact that R outfitted unique buy $450,000 ($900,000/2) will be remembered for Roy's gross domain and this sum speaks to the property that is given to M for reason for martial deduction.

In this way, R's martial deduction is $450,000

c.) Insurance policy on R's life is claimed by M and payable to her as the assigned recipient. It won't be remembered for net bequest of R and arrangement measure of $1 million isn't qualified for martial deduction. This is on the grounds that, martial deduction is permitted distinctly for property that is remembered for the perished companion's gross bequest.

Therefore, R's martial deduction is $0 million

d.)Insurance policy on R's life worth $500,000 possessed by R and M as the recipient. Despite the fact that the assigned recipient for protection arrangement on R's life is M (Roy's significant other), the sum is to be remembered for R's gross domain as it is possessed by R. This sum speaks to the property that is given to M for motivations behind martial deduction

Therefore, R's martial deduction is $500 million

e.) Dissemination from qualified pension plan of $1.6 million. Whole measure of $1.6 million will be moved to R's better half and it will be qualified for martial deduction

Therefore, R's martial deduction is $1.6 million

6 0

3 years ago

Fred Hash worked for Van Stavern Construction Co. as a field supervisor in charge of constructing a new plant facility. Hash ent

Eduardwww [97]

Answer:

Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour.

He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.

Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.

The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.

Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.

Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.

6 0

3 years ago

Deluxe Company has the following information: Total estimated manufacturing overhead costs $300,000 Total estimated machine hour

cluponka [151]

Answer:

its a formula, however long the machine is running the manufacturing rate will be higher thus increasing their income

Explanation:

7 0

3 years ago