- Affirmative action programs: <u>c. are controversial because they are seen as reverse discrimination</u>.
- One of the possible legal challenges to affirmative action programs is that they violate the <u>equal protection</u> clause of the <u>Fourteenth</u> Amendment. Because this amendment is at play, any affirmative action program that uses race or ethnicity as a basis for decision making is reviewed by the courts using <u>strict</u> scrutiny.
- Because discrimination law is primarily federal, states are not allowed to pass laws that ban affirmative action or protect classes other than those in the federal laws- <u>this is a false statement</u>.
<u>Explanation</u>:
An affirmative action is a program that uses past discrimination to justify present decisions by giving some sort of consideration to protected status.
Discrimination means treating an individual differently and unfairly because of their race, sex or social status. A discrimination law deals with the incidents of unequal or unfair treatment. People are even discriminated based on disability, genetic makeup and other personal characteristics.
According to <em><u>Fourteenth Amendment</u></em>, the court uses strict analysis to review affirmative action programs.
I believe the answer is: character
In leadership, character refers to the The way you act/use your position as a leader. This would include things such as your integrity, the ethical standard that you create for the organization, your self-awareness, your empathy toward other group members, your emotional health, etc.
Answer:
Because they didnt want a life they had before with the king
Explanation:
Answer:
True
Explanation:
A project Charter is a document signed by the sponsor in agreement that the project team is giving the go-ahead to carry out the project in accordance to the terms and conditions, this document shows those involved in the project, (Stake holders,project manager and team) After this document is given and signed in mutual agreement, then project kick off starts according to the schedule/plan.
The manner in which Suleiman appointed his court officials was revolutionary for his time.
Suleiman ignored the traditional ways of appointing officials through popularity, inheritance, social status, and/or wealth. He analyzed each candidate for their character and moral standing. Suleiman only appointed those who proved themselves to be trustworthy, honest, able, and provided good service(s).
