Answer: costs: might not work and have a dry spell
Benefits:it’s food and well food
Explanation:
"The Mughal–Persian Wars<span> were a series of wars fought in the 17th and 18th centuries between the </span>Safavids<span> and </span>Afsharid Empires<span> of Persia, and the </span>Mughal Empire<span>, over what is now Afghanistan. The Mughals consolidated their control of what is today India and Pakistan in the 16th century, and gradually came into conflict with the powerful Safavids and Afsharids, led by </span>Ismail I<span> and </span>Nader Shahrespectively. Aside from Nader Shah's invasion of the Mughal Empire, most of the conflict between the two powers were limited to battles for control over Kandahar."
Answer:
1. The population of this study is the entire people that are present in this bar.
2. The sample of the study are the people that are used to represent the population. The patrons
3. The independent variable are the conditions where some were told of secret ingredients and the untold condition.
4. The two levels of the independent variable is told and untold.
5. The dependent variable is the experience of taste.
Answer:
Respectful in tone and factual in nature and sent to the FDA district office
Explanation:
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is a federal agency of the United States Department of Health and Human Services that conduct regular inspection of institution to ensure that the consumers in the country do not buy unsafe products. When the inspection process in institutions gets completed and any form of deficiency is spotted, the institution is required to develop an action plan, sent to FDA in form of a letter with a respectful tone and the required factual information. The letter must contain corrective actions and timeline. The organisation would also send regular updates on the situations at hand to FDA.
Answer:
Limited financial resources to defend the action
Explanation:
The college student can state the inconvenience and the financial pressure the motion can result in because of the nature of the incident. The student does not have the financial resources to defend himself in State B. This also does not comply with the "traditional notions of fair play and substantial justice" given that the student will not be able to defend his actions. Another argument claiming lack of personal jurisdiction will be that the constitutional minimum contacts test has not been met. The fair play and fair justice argument will be based on financial limitations of the student. However, it must be kept in mind that in order for this argument to be string, the student will need to provide proof of severe inconvenience and financial pressure resulting from the motion.
