Answer:
revolutionary movement (or revolutionary social movement) is a specific type of social movement dedicated to carrying out a revolution. Charles Tilly defines it as "a social movement advancing exclusive competing claims to control of the state, or some segment of it".[1] Jeff Goodwin and James M. Jasper define it more simply (and consistently with other works[2][need quotation to verify]) as "a social movement that seeks, as minimum, to overthrow the government or state".[3]
A social movement may want to make various reforms and to gain some control of the state, but as long as they do not aim for an exclusive control, its members are not revolutionary.[4] Social movements may become more radical and revolutionary, or vice versa - revolutionary movements can scale down their demands and agree to share powers with others, becoming a run-of-the-mill political party.[4]
Answer:
The introduction of cash crops such as tobacco in American colonies such as Virginia, led to soil infertility out of depletion of nutrients.
Explanation:
Other than this, the introduction of cash crops, led to the need for more labor, hence more slave introduction to the colonies.
Conflict between the Colonial settlers and the Native Americans came as a result of the introduction of cash crop farming, such as the case of tobacco.
Introduction of cash crops, meant more large tracts of land put into use, colonial settlers had to take the land from native Americans, this led to the displacement of the native Americans.
Creation of new land for farming led to the cutting of trees and the killing of the game animals which adversely affected the way of life of the natives, that is Native American Indians.
Answer:
The Massachusetts Bay Colony government was able to be, at least partially, simultaneously theocratic, democratic, oligarchic, and authoritarian. It was able to be partly theocratic because of the doctrine of the covenant, which stated that the whole purpose of government was to enforce God’s laws. God’s laws applied to everyone, even nonbelievers. Everyone also had to pay taxes for the government-supported church. This meant that religious leaders held enormous power in the Massachusetts Bay Colony.
They were able to effectively control who was admitted to the church by conducting public interrogations of people who claimed to have experienced conversion. The last reason it was partially theocratic was one of the main governors, John Winthrop, believed he had a “calling” from God to lead the Massachusetts colony. The Massachusetts Bay Colony was partially democratic for a couple of reasons. First, the freemen elected the governor and his associates each year. The freemen also voted for a representative assembly called the General Court. The Colony was also partly an oligarchy.
It was an oligarchy because only Puritans could be freemen and were eligible to vote. Puritans were even more limited because religious leaders could control who was admitted into the church. Finally, the Massachusetts Bay Colony was partially authoritarian. This was partially because many of the residents were Puritans. Puritans shared in the “Protestant Ethic”, which involved serious commitment to work and to engagement in worldly pursuits. Everyone was held to these standards because of this. Everyone was expected to do this, even if they weren’t Puritan.
Explanation:
Workers mostly sell their labor in order to "<span>a. earn income" since those who employ them must pay them a wage, which they can use to buy food, recourses, etc. for themselves and their families. </span>
If your teacher selects you to speak on behalf of your class to the principal you are a "representative" of your class, in the sense that you are bringing the opinions of the whole class with you.