1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
oee [108]
3 years ago
8

Which evidence from the text supports the conclusion that Brutus and Cassius are in conflict? Select two options. “Remember Marc

h, the ides of March, remember.” “Did not great Julius bleed for justice’ sake?” “one of us, / That struck the foremost man of all this world” “Brutus, bay not me. / I’ll not endure it.” “Away, slight man!”
English
2 answers:
Alenkasestr [34]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:”Brutus, bay not me. / I’ll not endure it” and “Away, slight man!”

Explanation:

valentina_108 [34]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

“Did not great Julius bleed for justice’ sake?”

Explanation:

The question above is related to "Scene III" after the assassination of Julius Caesar. This happened inside the tent when Brutus and Cassius exchanged a conversation. Cassius incriminated Brutus because Brutus denounced Paella's bribing of the Sardians.  

Cassius instructed Brutus beforehand not to punish Paella, but he didn't listen. So, Cassius confronted him. However, Brutus reminded Cassius that they killed Caesar in order to attain justice and not to do something dishonorable for money. Their argument intensified, but in the end they reconciled.

You might be interested in
In Shery Turkle's Article, "The Flight from Conversation", How does Turkle supports her claim. Consider her diction, rhetorical
Serhud [2]

Answer:

We are living in the age of digital communication. At all times we see the launch of more technological devices, with more efficient connection networks that allow us to establish communication with anyone anywhere in the world who has access to this type of technology and the best, we can do this without leaving home .

This context seems to establish a perfect reality, where communication is increasingly efficient, but it is not quite so. At least not in the opinion of Sherry Turkle, who believes that in the best place for our communication, technology is destroying it.

In his article "The Flight from Conversation," Turkle states that technology is promoting the loss of the ability to socialize and establish a face-to-face conversation, where it is difficult to hide our real feelings, or "make up" our personality. The expensive conversation the face emits a certain vulnerability that the virtual conversation does not and therefore it is preferable

Turkle uses logical resources to show that disengagement is also an important factor in this situation, because we can be close to people with our goals, but at the same time away, because we don’t need to be close to talking to them, we don’t need to answer communication between them.

Turkle uses clear and direct words, so that anyone can conclude that as technology evolves, communication becomes more artificial and rare, with no real personal connection between individuals.

5 0
3 years ago
Which literary technique is used in the excerpt from Frankenstein by Mary Shelley
Alex Ar [27]

Answer:

Flashback

Explanation:

Novel Frankenstein is written in flashback method. The story in Frankenstein's dialogs and almost the whole novel is told in flashback. This way of telling a story is good because we have the impression that there are no mediums between the characters, it makes it a first hand story.

Flashback is a method that represents the disconnection of chronological order. When the story is told in flashback one continuous action is interrupted by the events that happened in the past. This way the writer gives us the background of the story and at the same time he continues with the story.

7 0
3 years ago
Which option corrects the double negative, yet has the same meaning as the following sentence? Since there is so much food here,
soldi70 [24.7K]
A. Since there is so much food here we can find something to eat.

All of the other sentences do NOT make sense when you read them in deeper context. A double negative is incorrect grammar! Double negatives are things like "not never" or "can't cannot." The meaning of this sentence is saying that there is lots of food so it will be easy to find something to eat. The only answer that reflects that meaning is A.

Hope this helps! If someone else answers I would love brainliest:)
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Recall what rules does frank break
Semenov [28]
Who is Frank/what is this from?
7 0
3 years ago
PLEASE HELP
aev [14]
It messed up her legs
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • We could’ve made this error. What does the bolded contraction mean? can of can have could have could of
    5·2 answers
  • Poetry is a genre of literature that offers readers a great variety of stories, thoughts, and images using different formats and
    10·2 answers
  • Read the claim.
    8·2 answers
  • In this excerpt from "The Lady of Shalott" by Alfred, Lord Tennyson, how does the repetition of words in the first four lines af
    6·1 answer
  • In what ways do the protaganist point of wiew reflect his cultural background
    12·1 answer
  • ***WILL GIVE BRAINLIEST TO THE FIRST CORRECT ANSWER***
    11·2 answers
  • Which two sentences are examples of technical writing?
    6·1 answer
  • Who has the worst reaction to Anne and Peter's reaction in Anne Frank?
    13·1 answer
  • What is the main theme of the short story "The Fan Club" by Rona
    6·1 answer
  • Can someone help me please with this put your own experience I'll give 50 points!!!! please ​
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!