First, the evolution of Eastern European communism: the former Eastern European countries to establish the communist regime, mostly Marxist practice, Marx from the study of the economy, emphasizing equality and wealth, that capitalists seek profits caused by workers' poverty, and thus to end the market Economy, the establishment of a communist society of equality, the world today proved his wrong, capitalism is not entirely allow workers to live in poor living environment, but in some countries to bring the overall economic level improved, but also With democracy and freedom, there are 10 Eastern European countries to join the EU, of which eight are former members of the Soviet Union-led Warsaw Pact. It is the people of Eastern Europe who further bid farewell to Marx, to abandon communism.a refers to the social organization based on public ownership, public production, public consumption, public autonomy, and even public sex. He began to expand from the 19th century, and from 1945 to 1949, communist regimes in Eastern Europe and Asia were established rapidly. But between 1989 and 1991, Eastern Europe and the Soviet Union quickly disintegrated into the entire communist regime in Europe:1986 Gorbachev put forward the reform plan of "democracy" and "openness"
Answer:
The Spanish-American War was an 1898 conflict between the United States and Spain that ended Spanish colonial rule in the Americas and resulted in U.S. acquisition of territories in the western Pacific and Latin America.
Answer:
The Articles of Confederation, sanctioned in 1777 by the Continental Congress, were the first fundamental norm of the United States, just after the American Revolution had begun and the independence of the nation from Great Britain was declared.
Through these Articles the political structure of the United States was organized, which established a collegiate government through the Congress of the Confederacy, which was made up equally by a representative from each of the 13 states of the country.
However, when it was proposed to modify this situation, the less populated states spoke out against it. This was so because the most populated states proposed a system of proportional representation based on the population of each state, with which the smaller states would see their political power reduced compared to larger states, such as Virginia or Massachusetts.
Answer:
A. If a candidate ran against Senator Smith, many people would vote for that candidate.
Explanation:
According to a different source, the rest of the question states:
<em>Which prediction can most likely be made based on this scenario?</em>
<em>A. If a candidate ran against Senator Smith, many people would vote for that candidate.</em>
<em>B. Even if a candidate ran against Senator Smith, people would not vote for either person.</em>
<em>C. If a candidate ran against Senator Smith, most people would continue to vote for Smith.</em>
<em>D. Even if Senator Smith decided not to run for office again, many people would vote for him as a write-in candidate.</em>
The prediction that is most likely to happen is that, if a candidate ran against Senator Smith, most people would vote for him. We know, based on the passage, that Senator Smith is not well-liked among voters, as he is not considered to be responsive to the needs of voters. Therefore, it is very possible that Senator Smith would find it difficult to compete with another candidate.
