1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dovator [93]
3 years ago
13

Why was Fort Ticonderoga heavily fortified?

History
2 answers:
schepotkina [342]3 years ago
8 0

Answer: it’s C mate

Explanation:

Gemiola [76]3 years ago
6 0
The main reason why Fort Ticonderoga was so heavily fortified was because "<span>C) It protected the water route to Canada," since this was a crucial fortification for the colonists to hold against the British. </span>
You might be interested in
Germany was reunified in<br> 1990<br> 1991<br> 1995<br> 1998
timofeeve [1]

Answer:

Explanation:

Germany was reunified in 1990

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
15 POINTS ANSWER ACCURATELY
AVprozaik [17]

Answer:

A.

<em>"left them unprotected."</em>

Explanation:

The most logical answer.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Describe two benefits and two challenges of transitioning to a democratic form of government.
sammy [17]

Answer:

In modern political thought, there are two approaches to the justification of democracy as the best system of government: value-based and rationally utilitarian. Value justifications regard democracy as a value in itself, as a political system that most fully embodies the most important humanistic values: freedom, equality, justice, etc.

The value approach is criticized primarily for its appeal to a democratically minded person who is truly striving for freedom and political equality. However, in the modern world, very many people, if not most, prefer not freedom (which they often perceive even as anti-value), but material well-being, security, and order. Therefore, they put a non-political, social meaning in the most respected values ​​of equality and justice, linking them to ensuring equal opportunities in life or rewarding merit, to which real democracy has a very weak relationship. All this casts doubt on the value group of arguments in favor of democracy.

A rational-utilitarian approach does not deny the certain significance of the value justifications of democracy, but at the same time pushes them to the background. This approach interprets democracy primarily as the most rational, useful way for citizens to organize a political system, allowing them to articulate and harmoniously combine their interests. The most consistently rational-utilitarian group of arguments is expressed in the systemic justifications of democracy: Democracy helps to prevent the rule of dictators, curb power, guarantee the protection of citizens from state arbitrariness; Democracy provides a higher level of economic development and higher rates of economic growth.

Of course, democracy, like any other political system, is not free from serious shortcomings, which, in fact, represent a continuation of its merits. Usually attention is paid to the following weaknesses of democracy:

1. The threat of destabilization of the political system arising from the very principle of election.

2. Political competition can result in conflictogenicity, confrontation, open clashes and, therefore, destabilization of the situation in society.

3. The danger of the tyranny of the majority, confident in its "rightness" and suppressing the will of those who remain in the minority.

4. Possible unprofessionalism of officials elected by an incompetent majority.

Explanation:

6 0
2 years ago
36. Intelligence efforts should focus on the group's:
baherus [9]
All of the above! Resource base, states/unstated goals, and membership.
6 0
1 year ago
How did white power structures react to the Civil Rights movement in the 1950s?
shepuryov [24]

Answer:

Generally, white power structures responded to the Civil Rights Movement based on their geographic location. Thus, most southerners spoke out against this movement, while most northerners supported the cause. This situation was even transversal to the Democratic and Republican parties, since for example Lyndon Johnson, Democratic President who approved the Civil Rights Act in 1964, supported the movement while Orval Faubus, Governor of Arkansas for the same party, did not do so in absolute.

In general, the governors and mayors of the south of the country did everything possible to prevent the advancement and achievements of this movement, through imprisonment (such as in Birmingham, where Martin Luther King was imprisoned), police repression and various government restrictions.

In contrast, northern politicians and those in Washington generally had a more open and responsive stance, supporting the movement and believing in equal opportunities.

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Presidents often make ___________________ with leaders of other nations because doing so does not require the approval of the Se
    11·1 answer
  • The european union was established so european nations could trade together without so many restrictions.
    9·2 answers
  • What similarities did the movement for the abolition of slavery share with the feminist movement in the nineteenth century?
    6·1 answer
  • 4. What were some of the general religious practices of each American Indian (Mayans, Incas, and the Aztecs) civilization?
    9·1 answer
  • What was a major effect of the Colombian Exchange
    8·1 answer
  • What goal was most important in shaping United States foreign policy between 1945 and<br> 1990?
    7·2 answers
  • Ldentify the beliefs of Protestants and the beliefs of Catholics.
    9·1 answer
  • Radar is most often used to __________.
    7·2 answers
  • I need a lil help if u dont mind
    7·2 answers
  • What was the goal of the Commission of Public Safety?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!