Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
it's obtuse the sides are to wide
Answer:
The data are at the
<u>Nominal</u> level of measurement.
The given calculation is wrong because average (mean) cannot be calculated for nominal level of measurement.
Step-by-step explanation:
The objective here is to Identify the level of measurement of the data, and explain what is wrong with the given calculation.
a)
The data are at the <u> Nominal </u> level of measurement due to the fact that it portrays the qualitative levels of naming and representing different hierarchies from 100 basketball, 200 basketball, 300 football, 400 anything else
b) We are being informed that, the average (mean) is calculated for 597 respondents and the result is 256.1.
The given calculation is wrong because average (mean) cannot be calculated for nominal level of measurement. At nominal level this type of data set do not measure at all , it is not significant to compute their average (mean).
0 × <span>0 = 0
0 </span>× <span>1 = 0
1 </span>× <span>1 = 1
Which means multiplication is closed under {0, 1}
</span><span>1 </span>÷ <span>1 = 1
0 </span>÷ <span>1 = 0
</span>
Division is not closed under {0, 1}
1 + 1 = 2
Addition is not closed under {0, 1}
0 - 1 = -1
Subtraction is not closed under {0, 1} either
So it's only A. Multiplication which is closed under {0, 1}
Answer:
If point C lies between two points A and B such that AC=BC, then point C is the bisector of A and B, that means it is at right the centre.
