Is the line increasing or decreasing y=-3x+19

pat and tim work together at a pizzeria, Pat can fold 30 pizza boxes per minute and tim can fold 20 pizza boxes per minute. Work

Marina CMI [18]

Step-by-step explanation:

1 min = 60 sec

Boxes both can fold per min = 30 + 20 = 50

No of boxes to fold = 200

Time taken in sec = 200 ÷ 50 = 4 min = 60 x 4 = 240 sec

5 0

3 years ago

art bought 4 boxes of pens but gave his friend ben 8 pens and now has a total of 112 pens how many are in a box? which of the fo

viktelen [127]

There was 30 in each box until he gave 8 away so no there is probably 28 in each box

sorry if i am wrong

4X - 8 = 112

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

complete each step of the below application problem using the letter answer choices type in the letter and each blank not all ch

amid [387]

Answer:

HWHHSAHhhj

Step-by-step explanation:

ahjdgajsags

7 0

3 years ago

John took all his money from his savings account. He spent $110 on a radio and 4/11 of what was left on presents for his friend

svp [43]

Answer:

$1210

Step-by-step explanation:

Let x be total amount

First John spent $110 on a radio and 4/11 of what was left on presents for his friends so he was left with

$\frac{7}{11}(x-110)=\frac{7}{11}x-70$

Then he put 2/5 of his remaining money into a checking account

$\frac{3}{5}\left(\frac{7}{11}x-70\right)$

Rest he donated to charity

$420=\frac{3}{5}\left(\frac{7}{11}x-70\right)\\\Rightarrow \left(\frac{7}{11}x-70\right)=\frac{2100}{3}\\\Rightarrow \frac{7}{11}x-70=700\\\Rightarrow \frac{7}{11}x=770\\\Rightarrow x=1210$

Hence total amount of money John originally had was $1210

8 0

3 years ago

In a study of the accuracy of fast food drive-through orders, McDonald’s had 33 orders that were not accurate among 362 orders o

melomori [17]

Answer:

A. We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of inaccurate orders p is 0.1.

B. Null hypothesis: $p=0.1$

Alternative hypothesis: $p \neq 0.1$

C. $z=\frac{0.0912 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{362}}}=-0.558$

D. $z_{\alpha/2}=-1.96$ $z_{1-\alpha/2}=1.96$

E. Fail to the reject the null hypothesis

F. So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of inaccurate orders is not significantly different from 0.1.

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

n=362 represent the random sample taken

X=33 represent the number of orders not accurate

$\hat p=\frac{33}{363}=0.0912$ estimated proportion of orders not accurate

$p_o=0.10$ is the value that we want to test

$\alpha=0.05$ represent the significance level

Confidence=95% or 0.95

z would represent the statistic (variable of interest)

$p_v$ represent the p value (variable of interest)

A: Write the claim as a mathematical statement involving the population proportion p

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to test the claim that the true proportion of inaccurate orders p is 0.1.

B: State the null (H0) and alternative (H1) hypotheses

Null hypothesis: $p=0.1$

Alternative hypothesis: $p \neq 0.1$

When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statistic, and the is given by:

$z=\frac{\hat p -p_o}{\sqrt{\frac{p_o (1-p_o)}{n}}}$ (1)

The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion $\hat p$ is significantly different from a hypothesized value $p_o$ .

C: Find the test statistic

Since we have all the info required we can replace in formula (1) like this:

$z=\frac{0.0912 -0.1}{\sqrt{\frac{0.1(1-0.1)}{362}}}=-0.558$

D: Find the critical value(s)

Since is a bilateral test we have two critical values. We need to look on the normal standard distribution a quantile that accumulates 0.025 of the area on each tail. And for this case we have:

$z_{\alpha/2}=-1.96$ $z_{1-\alpha/2}=1.96$

P value

It's important to refresh the p value method or p value approach . "This method is about determining "likely" or "unlikely" by determining the probability assuming the null hypothesis were true of observing a more extreme test statistic in the direction of the alternative hypothesis than the one observed". Or in other words is just a method to have an statistical decision to fail to reject or reject the null hypothesis.

The significance level provided $\alpha=0.05$ . The next step would be calculate the p value for this test.

Since is a bilateral test the p value would be:

$p_v =2*P(z$

E: Would you Reject or Fail to Reject the null (H0) hypothesis.

Fail to the reject the null hypothesis

F: Write the conclusion of the test.

So the p value obtained was a very high value and using the significance level given $\alpha=0.05$ we have $p_v>\alpha$ so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can said that at 5% of significance the true proportion of inaccurate orders is not significantly different from 0.1.

6 0

3 years ago