The Mongols treated the non-muslim subjects most fairly, while the Ottomans treated them the least fairly.
The Mongols were religiously tolerant because they conquered and rule through manpower rather than religion. The Ottomans were the least fair to non-muslims. It is close between the Umayyads and the Ottomans, but the only difference is the amount of discrimination (per se) held against non-muslims. While the Umayyads only had the jizya (tax paid if you were non-muslim), the Ottomans had distinctive restrictions on non-muslims. They had dress codes according to their religion and could only reside in neighborhoods who's residents were of the same religion (under the Ottomans).
The correct answer is D. To equal that of Brahman.
Explanation
In Hinduism, the atman is a concept to refer to the essence of the individual. This in turn is related to Brahman (the essential unit of everything that exists in the universe). So, the relationship between atman and Brahman is that Brahman, being the essential unit of everything existing in the universe, encompasses the essence of being, that is, atman in a singular sense. Moreover, the atman or indivudual should work to become or to equal the Brahman. So the correct answer is D. To equal that of Brahman.
Answer:
Both? here let me explain...
Explanation:
If you want to get technical, once the President assumes the Role of Commander in Chief of the United States Military he has control over all military action while congress; per the original intent of the constitution, has control over starting war and ending it. If you really had to choose one or the other the Commander in Chief has in most occurrences decided how war ends. I really hope this helped, if not my apologies and if you need any more elaboration please let me know down in the comments and I will do my best.
The answer is A i believe!! :)
Answer:
A. Nationalism
Explanation:
The underlying cause of World War I that the assassination of Franz Ferdinand, the Archduke of the Austro-Hungarian empire, represents is nationalism.
This is because the assassination was carried out by a nationalist terrorist called Princip whose group was fighting against the rule of Austria-Hungary over Bosnia.
