In a 2 for 1 stock split, par
value and market value will be 1/2 of what they were prior to the split and
number of shares will be two times what it was.
So,
par value will be 6 x 0.5 = $
3.00
market value will be 25 x 0.5
= $ 12.50
number of shares 8,000 x 2 will be
16,000 shares
Answer:
Inventar (no copiar de internet) un microcuento fantástico con alguno de los siguientes hechos sobrenaturales o inverosímiles: fantasmas, transformaciones, poderes increíbles, etc.
Explanation:
The answer base on the given scenario would be letter a,
Roger would gain benefits as he was protected from a financial loss as this
insurance covers him financially as the insurance of which premiums he has paid
and were to gain would only make him the person of having to have the benefit
as he is the one who has the insurance covered for him, which is entitled to
his name and that the benefits and offers would be his gain.
Answer:
The answer is Y = C + I + G + NX
Explanation:
National income can be represented as: Y = C + I + G + NX
where Y is the national income
C is the consumers' consumption or households' expenses on goods and services
I is the firms' investment. Investment done by businesses on procuring non-current assets used in production
G is the government expenditure.
NX is the net export. Net export is the difference between the total value of export and total value of import in a year.
Answer: C the fallacy of composition.
Explanation:
The Fallacy of Composition is meant to explain the false logic that people apply when they believe that because something is true of a subsection of something, then that thing must be true for the whole thing.
For instance, my phone's batter is made of lithium so my entire phone must be made of lithium.
In this scenario, the logic is that it is good to be involved in military conflict because it favors the nation if it favors a subset (employees in defense) which is flawed because other industries might suffer. This however, represents the fallacy of composition.