1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
zhuklara [117]
3 years ago
7

What led to the fall of the roman empire?

History
1 answer:
77julia77 [94]3 years ago
7 0
The were many reasons
1Invasions by Barbarian tribes

The most straightforward theory for Western Rome’s collapse pins the fall on a string of military losses sustained against outside forces

2Economic troubles and overreliance on slave labor

Even as Rome was under attack from outside forces, it was also crumbling from within thanks to a severe financial crisis

3The rise of the Eastern Empire

The fate of Western Rome was partially sealed in the late third century, when the Emperor Diocletian divided the Empire into two halves—the Western Empire seated in the city of Milan, and the Eastern Empire in Byzantium, later known as Constantinople.

4Weakening of the Roman legions

For most of its history, Rome’s military was the envy of the ancient world.

there were a lot more reasons as well but these are the main ones hope I helped

You might be interested in
What changes did communism bring to life in cuba?<br> time frame is near cuban missile crisis
Alinara [238K]
The changes that communism brought to Cuba were many. For one, commercial and political relationships were broken with many nations making Cuba an ethnocentric country. In relation to the atmosphere of the Cold War, communism greatly influenced contemporary geopolitics and the timeline of the Cold War. It brought to the United States and the Soviet Union to the brink of nuclear war that had become the daily fear in American society and elsewhere.
6 0
3 years ago
Read this passage:
MrMuchimi
C. Because if they are already preparing for the election and it is 5 years away.,,. Then that’s taking initiative
5 0
2 years ago
HELP PLS<br> Why is there only two senators in each state?
andreev551 [17]
If the system were being designed today, such a design probably would be rejected as unfair. Part of the problem is that the Framers were dealing with a less lopsided distribution. The ratio between most populous state and least populous stat in 1789 was about 7 to 1. Today, the ratio between California and Wyoming population is 50 to 1.

But the Senate made sense to the Framers in 1787 for a particular reason. At that time, all 13 former colonies were like independent nations or independent countries. They could mint their own coins, print their own money, and conduct international diplomacy directly with other nations. There are lots of reasons this was unsatisfactory. It produced economic chaos and a poor prospect of winning future wars, but it did give each state the status of a country.

Now, imagine you’re a small state like New Hampshire. Right now, you completely control your own destiny. Why do you want to join a Union unless you’re guaranteed a strong voice in that Union? Now, all the arguments that people still have about the Electoral College (“The big states would push all the little states around!”) actually do apply.

It is the Senate that does a superb job… if anything TOO good a job… of protecting “small states rights.” You can argue that it is an unfair system, and it probably is… but the point is this: In 1787, the question of how to get small states like New Hampshire to join this new Union, which was after all seemed like a risky experiment, was a big problem.

It’s really for political reasons, not absolute fairness, that the Senate was created in such a way as to give equal representation to each state. It seemed necessary in 1787. But there were lots of things that could not be foreseen, such as the rise of a strong national culture and the eventually lopsided ratios between the most populous and least populous states.

Now, let me address the “House of Representatives” question. How can the Senate be based on 2-senators-per-state while the House is based on population?
7 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
The treaty of Guadalupe hidalgo <br> resulted in
denpristay [2]
This treaty was a treaty of peace between Mexico and the United states ending the Mexican-American War.

8 0
3 years ago
How did general lee's war plan change after the victory at chancellorsville
Dmitry_Shevchenko [17]
The Battle of Chancellorsville (April 30-May 6, 1863) was a huge victory for the Confederacy and General Robert E. Lee during the Civil War, though it is also famous for being the battle in which Confederate General Thomas “Stonewall” Jackson was mortally wounded
4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Why did the English have poor relations with the Native Americans
    10·2 answers
  • Which circumstances were a major cause of Russian weakness in the mid-1800s? Select all the correct answers. autocratic rule sho
    5·1 answer
  • Need help with answer
    10·2 answers
  • 9. What did the ruling upper-class contribute to Egyptian society? (What things wouldn't have happened if they didn't exist?)​
    10·1 answer
  • Nomarchs
    11·1 answer
  • Name 2 accomplishments/inventions from the Ancient Romans and how they were<br> used
    15·1 answer
  • What was the fate of Buddhism and Hinduism in India?
    5·1 answer
  • Why was the Napoleonic Code important to napoleon and france​
    13·1 answer
  • Hat parts of Cortés's letter would be most interesting to a cultural historian?
    14·1 answer
  • Since the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, we have seen governments at all levels try to mount a response on a scale and ti
    6·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!