You cannot rely on the drawing alone to prove or disprove congruences. Instead, pull out the info about the sides and angles being congruent so we can make our decision.
The diagram shows that:
- Side AB = Side XY (sides with one tick mark)
- Side BC = Side YZ (sides with double tickmarks)
- Angle C = Angle Z (similar angle markers)
We have two pairs of congruent sides, and we also have a pair of congruent angles. We can't use SAS because the angles are not between the congruent sides. Instead we have SSA which is not a valid congruence theorem (recall that ambiguity is possible for SSA). The triangles may be congruent, or they may not be, we would need more information.
---------------
So to answer the question if they are congruent, I would say "not enough info". If you must go with a yes/no answer, then I would say "no, they are not congruent" simply because we cannot say they are congruent. Again we would need more information.
Answer:
[ry, yr, gy, yg, rg, gr]-Any three picks from this sample space.
Step-by-step explanation:
-The bag contains exactly
marbles.
-He picks one ball without looking, and chooses a second ball without replacing the first:
- If the first is red, the the second is either yellow or green,
- If the first is a yellow, then the second can be red or green,
- If the first is green, then the second can be a red or yellow.
The sample space of the second pick is therefore:
[ry, yr, gy, yg, rg, gr]
Hence, any three picks from the sample space are correct possible outcomes.
obviously 4 is bigger coz 12/7 will yeild you 1.71