What does the constitution require for a candidate to be approved as a federal judge

History

2 answers:

Nikitich [7]3 years ago

5 0

Nothing. The Constitution requires nothing of a candidate for the position of federal judge.

Softa [21]3 years ago

4 0

Answer:

There are no constitutional requirements for becoming a federal judge.

Explanation:

You might be interested in

What was one way American colonists resisted British policies before the

Akimi4 [234]

they declared their loyalty to france

4 0

3 years ago

Ap3x help please thanks

Vera_Pavlovna [14]

Answer:

Their deep divisions could lead to violence

Explanation:

The events of 1968 show deep divisions regarding Americans' views on politics. Many Americans wanted to maintain peace during the 1960s and opposed wars. As the Vietnam issue came up, America decided to interfere based on the Dinamo effect and to protect other Asian countries from converting into communism. There was a division based on ideas in America as some opposed against it while others supported it (the government). Often violence and marches were held by students on campuses and in Washington to show their protest against the government decision.

3 0

3 years ago

How did rebellions against the roman catholic church

alexgriva [62]

Conciliar movementA reform movement in the 14th-, 15th-, and 16th-century Catholic Church that held that supreme authority in the church resided with an Ecumenical council, apart from, or even against, the pope how did rebellions against the roman catholic church affect northern European society Rebellions against the Catholic Church exposed the corruption within the Church and lead to European reformers to develop new religions, such as Lutheranism and Calvinism, that believed in returning to the simplicity of Christianity and turning to the Bible.

8 0

3 years ago

How does the Washington Constitution define equality? In what ways does it make sure all citizens have equal rights? Write a par

seraphim [82]

The Washington constitution defines equality as treating people "without distinction or preference on account of race, color, caste, or sex."

Those concepts are often stretched to cover much more than that since the original idea is making no differentiation of citizens and their rights at all.

You can even see in Article I, Section 19 a text that says "All Elections shall be free and equal, and no power, civil or military, shall at any time interfere to prevent the free exercise of the right of suffrage."

There are other examples in Article 1 and 7 of claims for equality.

Article 7 Section 2 "The legislature shall provide by law a uniform and equal rate of assessment and taxation on all property in the state, according to its value in money, and shall prescribe such regulations by general law as shall secure a just valuation for taxation of all property, so that every person and corporation shall pay a tax in proportion to the value of his, her, or its property; Provided, that a deduction of debts from credits may be authorized: Provided, further, that the property of the United States and of the state, counties, school districts and other municipal corporations, and such other property as the legislature may by general laws provide, shall be exempt from taxation"

And Article 19 Section 1 "Equality of rights and responsibility under the law shall not be denied or abridged on account of sex."

8 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers

Compare the causes and effects of the development of constitutional monarchy in England with those of the development of absolut

Yanka [14]

It was the growing power of Parliament, and several incompetent monarchs which led to this. By the 17th century, Parliament had gained one power that the monarchy no longer had - they were in charge of raising taxes. King Charles I got into so many arguments over money, religion and political affairs that his own Parliament declared war on him. In the end, Parliament won and had the king executed. Oliver Cromwell became the dictator of England for 10 years (this period is known as the Commonwealth), and abolished an increasingly corrupt Parliament. After his death, both the Monarchy and Parliament were restored, and king Charles II became King. The Civil War led to a gradual increase in Parliament's power, which may well have stopped the country from having a revolution.

3 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers